IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v137y2015icp89-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Higher energy concentration traits in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) may increase profitability and improve energy conversion on dairy farms

Author

Listed:
  • Ludemann, C.I.
  • Eckard, R.J.
  • Cullen, B.R.
  • Jacobs, J.L.
  • Malcolm, B.
  • Smith, K.F.

Abstract

The effect of improving energy concentration of pasture dry matter (DM) in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) on two dairy farms in temperate regions (south west Victoria and Tasmania) of Australia was modeled in this study. A deterministic, dynamic model of a pasture based dairy system was used to assess how annual farm operating profit (OP), and energy conversion efficiency (as greenhouse gas emissions per unit of product) may be affected by an increase in metabolizable energy (ME) concentration of pasture compared to a ‘Base Scenario’ (with no changes in ME). Changes in OP were calculated over 20 1-year periods using three methods of utilizing additional ME from perennial ryegrass. These included the effect of an arbitrary 1 MJ/kg of dry matter (kg DM) increase in ME concentration of pasture on, milk production per cow with no change in the number of cows (‘Base1M Scenario’), no change in milk production per cow but an increase in stocking rate (‘Base1 +SR Scenario’), or a proportionate reduction in purchased concentrates (‘Base1-Conc Scenario’). The mean increase in OP relative to the Base Scenario was AUD482/ha.year for Terang and AUD783/ha.year for Elliott in the Base1M Scenario. This assumed additional ME in pasture was converted into greater milk production per cow using factors of 5.19 MJ/L milk for Terang and 5.23 MJ/L milk for Elliott. Changes in OP for the two other scenarios (Base1 +SR Scenario and Base-Conc Scenario) still provided between 40% and 54% increases in OP compared to the respective Base1M Scenarios. If the energy requirements of additional milk production was increased by 3 MJ/L milk, the OP in the Base1M Scenarios for Terang and Elliott were still 24% and 27% greater than the respective Base Scenarios. In terms of energy conversion, reductions of 10–13% of greenhouse gas emissions per unit of energy corrected milk were estimated for a 1 MJ/kg DM increase in pasture ME in the Base1M Scenarios compared to the respective Base Scenarios. The magnitude of changes in OP using alternative methods of calculation supports the hypothesis that increasing ME concentration of pasture could provide benefit to grazing-based dairy farms, regardless of how a farmer utilizes the additional ME. This study provides a valuable method to aid investment decisions about the value of the ME concentration trait and where best to allocate resources towards achieving these traits in perennial ryegrass.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludemann, C.I. & Eckard, R.J. & Cullen, B.R. & Jacobs, J.L. & Malcolm, B. & Smith, K.F., 2015. "Higher energy concentration traits in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) may increase profitability and improve energy conversion on dairy farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 89-100.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:137:y:2015:i:c:p:89-100
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.03.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X15000517
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.03.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Casey, J.W. & Holden, N.M., 2005. "Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 97-114, October.
    2. Ludemann, C.I. & Cullen, B.R. & Malcolm, Bill & Smith, K.F., 2013. "Economic values of changes in energy concentration of pasture in contrasting temperate dairy regions in Australia," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 10, pages 1-15.
    3. Hulme, D. J. & Kellaway, R. C. & Booth, P. J. & Bennett, L., 1986. "The CAMDAIRY model for formulating and analysing dairy cow rations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 81-108.
    4. Lewis, C.D. & Malcolm, Bill & Jacobs, J.L. & Spangenberg, G. & Smith, K.F., 2013. "A method to estimate the potential net benefits of trait improvements in pasture species: Transgenic white clover for livestock grazing systems," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 10, pages 1-16.
    5. Lewis, Claire & Malcolm, Bill & Farquharson, Robert J. & Leury, Brian & Behrendt, Ralph & Clark, Steve, 2012. "Economic analysis of improved perennial pasture systems," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Toro-Mujica, Paula & Vera, Raúl & Pinedo, Pablo & Bas, Fernando & Enríquez-Hidalgo, Daniel & Vargas-Bello-Pérez, Einar, 2020. "Adaptation strategies based on the historical evolution for dairy production systems in temperate areas: A case study approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lewis, Claire D. & Smith, Kevin F. & Jacobs, Joe L. & Ho, Christie K.M. & Leddin, Clare M. & Malcolm, Bill, 2020. "Using a two-price market value method to value extra pasture DM in different seasons," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Parsons, D. J., 1998. "Optimising silage harvesting plans in a grass and grazing simulation using the revised simplex method and a genetic algorithm," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 29-44, January.
    3. Hoffman, Eric & Cavigelli, Michel A. & Camargo, Gustavo & Ryan, Matthew & Ackroyd, Victoria J. & Richard, Tom L. & Mirsky, Steven, 2018. "Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in organic and conventional grain crop production: Accounting for nutrient inflows," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 89-96.
    4. Malý, M. & Hálová, P. & Havlíková, M. & Žáková-Kroupová, Z., 2017. "Valuation of Public Goods: The Case of Emissions from Livestock Holdings in the Czech Republic," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(1), March.
    5. Agostinho, F. & Oliveira, M.W. & Pulselli, F.M. & Almeida, C.M.V.B. & Giannetti, B.F., 2019. "Emergy accounting as a support for a strategic planning towards a regional sustainable milk production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Raymond L. Desjardins & Devon E. Worth & Xavier P. C. Vergé & Dominique Maxime & Jim Dyer & Darrel Cerkowniak, 2012. "Carbon Footprint of Beef Cattle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(12), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Thomassen, M.A. & Dolman, M.A. & van Calker, K.J. & de Boer, I.J.M., 2009. "Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2278-2284, June.
    8. Neal, Mark & Neal, James & Fulkerson, Bill, 2006. "Choosing the best forage species for a dairy farm: The whole-farm approach," Risk and Sustainable Management Group Working Papers 149863, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    9. Pelletier, N., 2008. "Environmental performance in the US broiler poultry sector: Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas, ozone depleting, acidifying and eutrophying emissions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 67-73, September.
    10. Pishgar-Komleh, Seyyed Hassan & Omid, Mahmoud & Heidari, Mohammad Davoud, 2013. "On the study of energy use and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in greenhouse cucumber production in Yazd province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 63-71.
    11. Wu, L. & Harris, P. & Misselbrook, T.H. & Lee, M.R.F., 2022. "Simulating grazing beef and sheep systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Verge, X.P.C. & Dyer, J.A. & Desjardins, R.L. & Worth, D., 2007. "Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian dairy industry in 2001," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 683-693, June.
    13. Tocker, Jonathon & Malcolm, B. & Heard, J. & Ho, C. & Behrendt, R., 2022. "Profitable Sheep Farming in South-west Victoria: Specialisation or Diversification Under Volatile Prices, Costs and Climate," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 19(1), April.
    14. Ludemann, Cameron, 2022. "Estimated Annual Value of a Forage Cultivar Selection Decision Tool for New Zealand Sheep and Beef Farmers," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 19(1), April.
    15. Castanheira, É.G. & Dias, A.C. & Arroja, L. & Amaro, R., 2010. "The environmental performance of milk production on a typical Portuguese dairy farm," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(7), pages 498-507, September.
    16. Fiona Kenyon & Jan M. Dick & Ron I. Smith & Drew G. Coulter & David McBean & Philip J. Skuce, 2013. "Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Worm Control in Lambs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Freer, M. & Moore, A. D. & Donnelly, J. R., 1997. "GRAZPLAN: Decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises--II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 77-126, May.
    18. Almas, Lal K & Guerrero, Bridget L & Lust, David G & Fatima, Hina & Mensah, Emmanuel, 2017. "Effect of Silage Quality on Milk Production and Ogallala Aquifer Conservation Potential in the Texas High Plains," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252737, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    19. Ludemann, C.I. & Cullen, B.R. & Malcolm, Bill & Smith, K.F., 2013. "Economic values of changes in energy concentration of pasture in contrasting temperate dairy regions in Australia," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 10, pages 1-15.
    20. Nijdam, Durk & Rood, Trudy & Westhoek, Henk, 2012. "The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 760-770.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:137:y:2015:i:c:p:89-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.