IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ3/2017-01-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Differences of Asian and Western Consumers’ Attitudes towards Brand Extensions by Information Types: Attributerelated versus Non-attribute-related Information

Author

Listed:
  • Jae Jin Lee

    (College of Business Administration, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Korea,)

  • Sung-Jun Lee

    (College of International and Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Korea)

Abstract

This study aims to empirically examine how Asian and Western consumers with different cultural backgrounds (holistic vs. analytic thinking) in different brand extension situations (high vs. low brand-extension fit) perceive two different types of brand extension information (attribute-related vs. non-attribute-related information). The previous brand extension studies have demonstrated that Asian consumers are considerably better in recognizing fit between parent brands and their extensions than Western consumers. However, only few studies have been conducted so far to investigate how firms can effectively communicate with consumers from different cultures when extending their existing brands. For that, an inter-subjects experiment consisting of 2 (high vs. low similarity with parent brands) *2 (attribute-related vs. non-attribute-related information) *2 (Asian vs. Western consumers) groups was conducted with the samples from South Korea, US, Canada and France (N = 393). As a result, Westerners tended to show more favor to attribute-related information than Asians when brand-extension fit was high. When brand-extension fit was low, however, Asians tended to show more favor to attribute-related information than Westerners. In addition, Asians overall showed more favor to low-similarity extensions compared to Westerners when non-attitude-related information was suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Jae Jin Lee & Sung-Jun Lee, 2017. "The Differences of Asian and Western Consumers’ Attitudes towards Brand Extensions by Information Types: Attributerelated versus Non-attribute-related Information," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 281-290.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2017-01-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/download/3506/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/3506/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MacKenzie, Scott B, 1986. "The Role of Attention in Mediating the Effect of Advertising on Attribute Importance," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(2), pages 174-195, September.
    2. Sharon Ng & Michael J. Houston, 2006. "Exemplars or Beliefs? The Impact of Self-View on the Nature and Relative Influence of Brand Associations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(4), pages 519-529, March.
    3. Dawar, Niraj & Anderson, Paul F., 1994. "The effects of order and direction on multiple brand extensions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 119-129, June.
    4. Sengupta, Jaideep & Johar, Gita Venkataramani, 2002. "Effects of Inconsistent Attribute Information on the Predictive Value of Product Attitudes: Toward a Resolution of Opposing Perspectives," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(1), pages 39-56, June.
    5. Reddy, Mergen & Terblanche, Nic & Pitt, Leyland & Parent, Michael, 2009. "How far can luxury brands travel? Avoiding the pitfalls of luxury brand extension," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 187-197.
    6. Barone, Michael J & Miniard, Paul W & Romeo, Jean B, 2000. "The Influence of Positive Mood on Brand Extension Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(4), pages 386-400, March.
    7. Park, C Whan & Milberg, Sandra & Lawson, Robert, 1991. "Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 185-193, September.
    8. Swaminathan, Vanitha, 2003. "Sequential brand extensions and brand choice behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 431-442, June.
    9. Alokparna Basu Monga & Deborah Roedder John, 2007. "Cultural Differences in Brand Extension Evaluation: The Influence of Analytic versus Holistic Thinking," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(4), pages 529-536, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeffrey R. Parker & Donald R. Lehmann & Kevin Lane Keller & Martin G. Schleicher, 2018. "Building a multi-category brand: when should distant brand extensions be introduced?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 300-316, March.
    2. Kim, Kyeongheui & Park, Jongwon, 2019. "Cultural influences on brand extension judgments: Opposing effects of thinking style and regulatory focus," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 137-150.
    3. Sung Youl Jun & Hye Kyung Park & Kyung Ho Kim, 2022. "The effects of nostalgia marketing on consumers’ brand extension evaluation," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 271-286, May.
    4. Deng, Qian (Claire) & Messinger, Paul R., 2022. "Dimensions of brand-extension fit," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 764-787.
    5. Kevin Lane Keller, 2016. "Reflections on customer-based brand equity: perspectives, progress, and priorities," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Smith, Robert W. & Keller, Kevin Lane, 2021. "If all their products seem the same, all the parts within a product seem the same too: How brand homogeneity polarizes product experiences," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 698-714.
    7. Kapoor, Harish & Heslop, Louise A., 2009. "Brand positivity and competitive effects on the evaluation of brand extensions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 228-237.
    8. Gierl, Heribert & Huettl, Verena, 2011. "A closer look at similarity: The effects of perceived similarity and conjunctive cues on brand extension evaluation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 120-133.
    9. Beichen Liang & Wei Fu, 2021. "The choice of brand extension: the moderating role of brand loyalty on fit and brand familiarity," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 17-32, March.
    10. Martínez, Eva & Montaner, Teresa & Pina, José M., 2009. "Brand extension feedback: The role of advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 305-313, March.
    11. Paul W. Miniard & Rama K. Jayanti & Cecilia M. O. Alvarez & Peter R. Dickson, 2018. "What brand extensions need to fully benefit from their parental heritage," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 948-963, September.
    12. Pourazad, Naser & Stocchi, Lara & Pare, Vipul, 2019. "Brand attribute associations, emotional consumer-brand relationship and evaluation of brand extensions," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 249-260.
    13. Kim, Kyeongheui & Park, Jongwon & Kim, Jungkeun, 2014. "Consumer–brand relationship quality: When and how it helps brand extensions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 591-597.
    14. Xenia Raufeisen & Linda Wulf & Sören Köcher & Ulya Faupel & Hartmut H. Holzmüller, 2019. "Spillover effects in marketing: integrating core research domains," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 249-267, December.
    15. Vladimir Sashov Zhechev & Evgeni Stanimirov, 2017. "Image Effects of the Extension of Niche Class F Vehicles in Bulgaria," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 132-171.
    16. Koo, Minkyung & Shavitt, Sharon & Lalwani, Ashok K. & Chinchanachokchai, Sydney, 2020. "Engaging in a culturally mismatched thinking style increases the preference for familiar consumer options for analytic but not holistic thinkers," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 837-852.
    17. Dens, Nathalie & De Pelsmacker, Patrick, 2010. "Attitudes toward the extension and parent brand in response to extension advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1237-1244, November.
    18. Nathalie Veg-Sala & Elyette Roux, 2018. "Cross-gender extension potential of luxury brands: a semiotic analysis," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(5), pages 436-448, September.
    19. Pina, José M. & Dall'Olmo Riley, Francesca & Lomax, Wendy, 2013. "Generalizing spillover effects of goods and service brand extensions: A meta-analysis approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1411-1419.
    20. Darren Filson & James H. Havlicek, 2018. "The performance of global film franchises: installment effects and extension decisions," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(3), pages 447-467, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Holistic versus Analytic Thinking; Attribute-related versus Non-attribute-related Information; Brand Extensions; Brand-extension Fit;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M3 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2017-01-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.