IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000180/018530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comportamiento de los agentes en el comercio electrónico según modelos de localización

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Hernán González-Campo
  • Vanessa Zamora Mina

Abstract

Dentro del amplio espectro de la utilización de la Teoría de Juegos en la actividad económica, de entre sus muchas aplicaciones teóricas y empíricas concernientes a la toma de decisiones empresariales en forma de juegos, resaltamos aquella que tiene por objeto de estudio entender las relaciones entre las empresas en un contexto microeconómico. Específicamente, en el contexto del comercio electrónico, que actualmente ha alcanzado un nivel de inserción muy importante y diverso en todos los sectores. El presente artículo es el resultado de una investigación exploratoria en tres fases donde, por medio de la metodología de investigación de acción participativa, se logra una contrastación del modelo de Ciudad Circular, pro-puesto por Salop en 1979, en el contexto de los negocios electrónicos, específicamente en eBay.******Within the broad spectrum of the use of game theory in economic activity and its many theoreti-cal and empirical applications to business decision-making, we highlight the one whose subject matter is to understand the relationships among companies in a microeconomic environment such as e-commerce. This is because e-commerce has currently reached a very significant and diverse level of insertion in all sec-tors. This article derives from three-phased exploratory research in which, using the participatory action research method, Salop’s circular city model (1979) is corroborated in the context of electronic business, specifically on eBay.******No contexto da utilizacao da Teoria dos Jogos na atividade economica, entre suas muitas aplica-coes teóricas e empíricas referentes a tomada de decisoes empresariais em forma de jogos, destacamos a que tem o objetivo de entender as relacoes entre as empresas em um contexto microeconomico. Em es-pecífico, no ambito do comércio eletronico, que atualmente atinge um nível de insercao muito importante e diverso em todos os setores. Este artigo é resultado de uma pesquisa exploratória em tres fases em que, por meio da metodologia de pesquisa de acao participativa, chega-se a um contraste do modelo de cidade circular, proposto por Salop em 1979, na área dos negócios eletronicos, em particular no eBay.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Hernán González-Campo & Vanessa Zamora Mina, 2020. "Comportamiento de los agentes en el comercio electrónico según modelos de localización," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 28(1), pages 47-65, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000180:018530
    DOI: 10.18359/rfce.4255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.18359/rfce.4255
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18359/rfce.4255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tolotti, Marco & Yepez, Jorge, 2020. "Hotelling-Bertrand duopoly competition under firm-specific network effects," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 105-128.
    2. Jean Tirole, 1988. "The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262200716, December.
    3. Jason Kuruzovich & Hila Etzion, 2018. "Online Auctions and Multichannel Retailing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2734-2753, June.
    4. Heidrun Hoppe & Ulrich Lehmann-Grube, 2008. "Price competition in markets with customer testing: the captive customer effect," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 35(3), pages 497-521, June.
    5. Giacomo Bonanno, 1987. "Location Choice, Product Proliferation and Entry Deterrence," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 54(1), pages 37-45.
    6. Zsolt Katona & Miklos Sarvary, 2008. "Network Formation and the Structure of the Commercial World Wide Web," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 764-778, 09-10.
    7. Kieron Meagher & Klaus Zauner, 2005. "Location-then-price competition with uncertain consumer tastes," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 25(4), pages 799-818, June.
    8. Brams, Steven J., 2012. "Game Theory and the Humanities: Bridging Two Worlds," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262518252, December.
    9. Michael Geisler & Harald Wiese, 2006. "Entry deterrence in the Schmalensee-Salop model," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 127-130.
    10. Camilo Sarmiento & William W. Wilson, 2005. "Spatial Modeling in Technology Adoption Decisions: The Case of Shuttle Train Elevators," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(4), pages 1034-1045.
    11. Tobias Wenzel, 2011. "Deregulation of Shopping Hours: The Impact on Independent Retailers and Chain Stores," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 113(1), pages 145-166, March.
    12. Subhadip Chakrabarti & Robert P. Gilles, 2017. "Partial Cooperation in Location Choice: Salop’s Model with Three Firms," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Lina Mallozzi & Egidio D'Amato & Panos M. Pardalos (ed.), Spatial Interaction Models, pages 21-38, Springer.
    13. Richard Schmalensee, 1978. "Entry Deterrence in the Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 9(2), pages 305-327, Autumn.
    14. Schmitt, Nicolas, 1995. "Product Imitation, Product Differentiation and International Trade," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 36(3), pages 583-608, August.
    15. A. P. Lerner & H. W. Singer, 1937. "Some Notes on Duopoly and Spatial Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45, pages 145-145.
    16. Toshihiro Matsumura & Noriaki Matsushima, 2004. "Endogenous Cost Differentials between Public and Private Enterprises: A Mixed Duopoly Approach," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 71(284), pages 671-688, November.
    17. Richard Gray & Stavroula Malla, 2011. "Managing Public IP with Downstream Interfirm Research Spillovers," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 59(4), pages 475-491, December.
    18. Steven C. Salop, 1979. "Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 141-156, Spring.
    19. Bauner, Christoph, 2015. "Mechanism choice and the buy-it-now auction: A structural model of competing buyers and sellers," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 19-31.
    20. Toshihiro Matsumura, 2005. "Competition‐Accelerating Public Investments," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 269-274, September.
    21. Uri Simonsohn, 2010. "eBay's Crowded Evenings: Competition Neglect in Market Entry Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(7), pages 1060-1073, July.
    22. Timo Goeschl & Danilo Camargo Igliori, 2004. "Reconciling Conservation and Development: A Dynamic Hotelling Model of Extractive Reserves," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 80(3), pages 340-354.
    23. G. C. Archibald & G. Rosenbluth, 1975. "The "New" Theory of Consumer Demand and Monopolistic Competition," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 89(4), pages 569-590.
    24. Shapley, L. S. & Shubik, Martin, 1954. "A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 787-792, September.
    25. Kevin Zhu, 2004. "Information Transparency of Business-to-Business Electronic Markets: A Game-Theoretic Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 670-685, May.
    26. Nancy B. Kurland & Terri D. Egan, 1999. "Telecommuting: Justice and Control in the Virtual Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 500-513, August.
    27. Garth Saloner, 1991. "Modeling, game theory, and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S2), pages 119-136, December.
    28. Grebe, Tim & Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta & Kröger, Sabine, 2018. "How Do Sellers Benefit From Buy-It-Now Prices in Ebay Auctions? -- an Experimental Investigation," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 97, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Baranzoni & P. Bianchi & L. Lambertini, 2000. "Multiproduct Firms, Product Differentiation, and Market Structure," Working Papers 368, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    2. Constantatos, Christos & Perrakis, Stylianos, 1995. "Différenciation verticale et structure du marché," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 71(1), pages 71-98, mars.
    3. Gabszewicz, Jean J. & Marini, Marco A. & Tarola, Ornella, 2016. "Vertical Differentiation and Collusion: Cannibalization or Proliferation?," ETA: Economic Theory and Applications 232221, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    4. Jean J. Gabszewicz & Marco A. Marini & Ornella Tarola, 2016. "Vertical Differentiation and Collusion: Cannibalization or Proliferation?," Working Papers 2016.15, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    5. Ramon Caminal & Lluís M. Granero, 2012. "Multi‐product Firms and Product Variety," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 79(314), pages 303-328, April.
    6. Caminal, Ramon, 2006. "Too Many or Too Few Varieties? The Role of Multiproduct Firms," CEPR Discussion Papers 5938, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Peter-J. Jost, 2023. "Price commitment and the strategic launch of a fighter brand," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 381-435, September.
    8. Yogesh V. Joshi & David J. Reibstein & Z. John Zhang, 2016. "Turf Wars: Product Line Strategies in Competitive Markets," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 128-141, January.
    9. Gabszewicz, Jean J. & Marini, Marco A. & Tarola, Ornella, 2017. "Vertical differentiation and collusion: Pruning or proliferation?," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 129-139.
    10. de Haas, Samuel & Herold, Daniel & Schäfer, Jan Thomas, 2022. "Entry deterrence due to brand proliferation: Empirical evidence from the German interurban bus industry," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Figerl, Jürgen & Grandner, Thomas, 2008. "Job quality and wages in duopsony," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 121, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    12. Jean J. Gabszewicz & Jacques-François Thisse, 2000. "Microeconomic theories of imperfect competition," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 37(1), pages 47-99.
    13. Chisholm, Darlene C. & Norman, George, 2012. "Market access and competition in product lines," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 429-435.
    14. Eberhard Feess & Michael Hoeck & Oliver Lorz, 2009. "International Technology Transfers and Competition," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(5), pages 1038-1052, November.
    15. Belleflamme,Paul & Peitz,Martin, 2015. "Industrial Organization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107687899, January.
    16. Simon Loertscher & Gerd Muehlheusser, 2008. "Dynamic Location Games," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1042, The University of Melbourne.
    17. Laurent d'Ursel, 1983. "Politiques de « non-prix » : Equilibre et optimum," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(6), pages 1057-1088.
    18. Vermeulen, Ben & La Poutré, Han & de Kok, Ton, 2012. "Dynamics and equilibria under incremental horizontal differentiation on the Salop circle," MPRA Paper 51449, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Panos Fousekis, 2016. "Member Coordination Costs and Spatial Entry Deterrence in a Mixed Duopsony with a Cooperative," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 340-354, July.
    20. L. Lambertini, 2002. "the Specialization of Production and Labour Mobility Under Endogenous Differentiation," Working Papers 453, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    teoría de juegos; comercio electrónico; juegos de localización; ciudad circular;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C70 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - General
    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000180:018530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Administrador (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/femngco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.