IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v57y2004i16p03-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elite universities: Could they make Germany more attractive as a site for research and investment?

Author

Listed:
  • Gerd Grözinger
  • Oliver Fabel
  • Dominique Demougin
  • Matthias Kräkel

Abstract

The plan of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research to provide special support for up to ten top universities to enhance scientific research in Germany science is assessed quite sceptically by Prof. Gerd Groezinger, University of Flensburg. He considers it more important to re-introduce more research to the universities, which have been "degraded to teaching institutions", via a promotion of more intensive co-operation between non-university research institutions. "The simplest solution would be to take the projected quarter billion euros annually and give it to the DFG with minor conditions. One idea would be for university members to "buy out" of teaching for a limited time and to work on a project at a Max Planck institute, for example... Specialists from the institute could also work for a limited time at the universities, up-dating the students on current research. For Prof. Oliver Fable, University of Constance, and Prof. Dominique Demougin, Humboldt University, Berlin, the greatest problem is "the inefficient organisation of the German scientific system in which too much is invested in general areas and too little in specific human capital. What is necessary, instead, is a clear increase in professorships in order to implement the advantages of greater specialisation. This would require reorganising German universities to a departmental structure in place of the present concentration on professorial chairs. Prof. Matthias Kräkel, University of Bonn, argues for combining top disciplines into research networks that would receive targeted funding: "A clear affirmative for the promotion of top research at German universities, however, in the form of a specifically funding research networks to forego the danger that tax money transferred to 'elite universities', using the principle of 'equal shares for all', may be inefficiently utilised."

Suggested Citation

  • Gerd Grözinger & Oliver Fabel & Dominique Demougin & Matthias Kräkel, 2004. "Elite universities: Could they make Germany more attractive as a site for research and investment?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 57(16), pages 03-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:57:y:2004:i:16:p:03-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2004_16_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary S. Becker & Kevin M. Murphy, 1994. "The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge," NBER Chapters, in: Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Third Edition, pages 299-322, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Michael Kremer, 1993. "The O-Ring Theory of Economic Development," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(3), pages 551-575.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven N. Durlauf & Ananth Seshadri, 2003. "Is assortative matching efficient?," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 21(2), pages 475-493, March.
    2. Krishna, Pravin & Levchenko, Andrei A., 2013. "Comparative advantage, complexity, and volatility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 314-329.
    3. David J. Deming, 2017. "The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(4), pages 1593-1640.
    4. Lora, Eduardo & Cortés, Patricia & Herrera, Ana María, 2001. "Los obstáculos al desarrollo empresarial y el tamaño de las firmas en América Latina," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 2144, Inter-American Development Bank.
    5. Molina-Domene, Maria, 2018. "Labor specialization as a source of market frictions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91703, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Galashin Mikhail & Popov Sergey V., 2016. "Teamwork Efficiency and Company Size," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 337-366, January.
    7. Tamura, Robert, 2002. "Human capital and the switch from agriculture to industry," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 207-242, December.
    8. David Levine, 2012. "Production Chains," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 15(3), pages 271-282, July.
    9. Dipankar Das, 2022. "A Relationship Between the Factor Indivisibility and the Output Elasticity of the Indivisible Factor," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 10(1), pages 82-105, June.
    10. Benjamin F. Jones, 2008. "The Knowledge Trap: Human Capital and Development Reconsidered," NBER Working Papers 14138, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Swisher IV, S. N., 2017. "Reassessing Railroads and Growth: Accounting for Transport Network Endogeneity," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1718, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    12. Eduardo Lora & Patricia Cortés, 2001. "Obstacles to Business Development and the Size of Firms in Latin America," Research Department Publications 4257, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    13. Soo, Kwok Tong, 2017. "Indivisibilities in the Ricardian model of trade," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 311-317.
    14. R. Grafton & Tom Kompas & P. Owen, 2007. "Bridging the barriers: knowledge connections, productivity and capital accumulation," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 219-231, December.
    15. Lex Borghans & Bas Weel, 2006. "The Division of Labour, Worker Organisation, and Technological Change," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 116(509), pages 45-72, February.
    16. Frank Neffke, 2017. "Coworker Complementarity," SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-05, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    17. Fagnart, Jean-François & Germain, Marc, 2015. "Energy, complexity and sustainable long-term growth," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 87-93.
    18. Benjamin F. Jones, 2014. "The Human Capital Stock: A Generalized Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(11), pages 3752-3777, November.
    19. Kikuchi, Tomoo & Nishimura, Kazuo & Stachurski, John, 2018. "Span of control, transaction costs and the structure of production chains," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(2), May.
    20. Kuhn, Moritz & Luo, Jinfeng & Manovskii, Iourii & Qiu, Xincheng, 2023. "Coordinated firm-level work processes and macroeconomic resilience," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 107-127.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:57:y:2004:i:16:p:03-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.