IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbk/journl/v9y2020i2p155-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighting on Systemic Important Banking (SIB) in Indonesia: The Official Versus PCA Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Samsul Anwar

    (Department of Statistics, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia)

Abstract

In determining its Domestic Systemic Important Banking (D-SIB), Indonesia implemented the Global Systemic Important Banking (G-SIB) based on three of five indicators, those being size, interconnectedness, and complexity. Both the G-SIB and the Indonesian D-SIB use an equal weight for each indicator, that is, 1/5 and 1/3 respectively. However, the weight could be modified by using the eigenvector of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA). We showed that this new weighting system was better than the official weighting system (referred to in this paper as the POJK approach) based on the Financial Services Authority (OJK) regulation No.46/POJK.03/2015.

Suggested Citation

  • Samsul Anwar, 2020. "Weighting on Systemic Important Banking (SIB) in Indonesia: The Official Versus PCA Approaches," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 9(2), pages 155-182.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbk:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:155-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cbcg.me/repec/cbk/journl/vol9no2-8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moratis, Georgios & Sakellaris, Plutarchos, 2021. "Measuring the systemic importance of banks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Enock Nyorekwa Twinoburyo & Nicholas M Odhiambo, 2018. "Can Monetary Policy drive economic growth? Empirical evidence from Tanzania," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 12(2), June.
    3. Nikola Fabris, 2018. "Challenges for Modern Monetary Policy," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 7(2), pages 5-24.
    4. Huang, Xin & Zhou, Hao & Zhu, Haibin, 2009. "A framework for assessing the systemic risk of major financial institutions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2036-2049, November.
    5. Nikola Tarashev & Claudio Borio & Kostas Tsatsaronis, 2010. "Attributing systemic risk to individual institutions," BIS Working Papers 308, Bank for International Settlements.
    6. Jovan Djuraskovic & Milivoje Radovic & Milena Radonjic Konatar, 2018. "The Controversies of Modern Macroeconomic Theory in the Context of the Global Economic Crisis," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 7(2), pages 49-72.
    7. Office of Financial Research (ed.), . "Size Alone is Not Sufficient to Identify Systemically Important Banks," Viewpoint Papers, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury, number 17-04.
    8. Enock Nyorekwa Twinoburyo & Nicholas M. Odhiambo, 2018. "Monetary Policy and Economic Growth: A Review of International Literature," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 7(2), pages 123-137.
    9. Deon Filmer & Lant Pritchett, 1999. "The Effect of Household Wealth on Educational Attainment: Evidence from 35 Countries," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 25(1), pages 85-120, March.
    10. Céline Gauthier & Alfred Lehar & Moez Souissi, 2010. "Macroprudential Regulation and Systemic Capital Requirements," Staff Working Papers 10-4, Bank of Canada.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Le Dinh Hac & Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy & Nguyen Ngoc Thach & Bui Minh Chuyen & Pham Thi Hong Nhung & Tran Duc Thang & Tran Tuan Anh, 2021. "Enhancing risk management culture for sustainable growth of Asia commercial bank -ACB in Vietnam under mixed effects of macro factors," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 291-307, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mr. Dimitri G Demekas, 2015. "Designing Effective Macroprudential Stress Tests: Progress So Far and the Way Forward," IMF Working Papers 2015/146, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Paola Bongini & Laura Nieri, 2014. "Identifying and Regulating Systemically Important Financial Institutions," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 43(1), pages 39-62, February.
    3. Lu, Jing & Hu, Xiaohong, 2014. "Novel three-bank model for measuring the systemic importance of commercial banks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 238-246.
    4. Chen Chen & Garud Iyengar & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2013. "An Axiomatic Approach to Systemic Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1373-1388, June.
    5. Ibrahim Alshomaly & Walid Shawaqfeh, 2020. "The Effect of Export Diversification on the Economic Growth of West-Asian Arab Countries," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 9(2), pages 429-450, April.
    6. Reboredo, Juan C. & Ugolini, Andrea, 2015. "A vine-copula conditional value-at-risk approach to systemic sovereign debt risk for the financial sector," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 98-123.
    7. Martin Eling & David Antonius Pankoke, 2016. "Systemic Risk in the Insurance Sector: A Review and Directions for Future Research," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 19(2), pages 249-284, September.
    8. Kamila Sommer, 2014. "Fertility Choice in a Life Cycle Model with Idiosyncratic Uninsurable Earnings Risk," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2014-32, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    9. Dávila-Ospina, Andrés O., 2023. "Hysteresis From Monetary Policy Mistakes: How Bad Could It Be?," Documentos CEDE 21003, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    10. Saldías, Martín, 2013. "Systemic risk analysis using forward-looking Distance-to-Default series," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 498-517.
    11. Danielsson, Jon & James, Kevin R. & Valenzuela, Marcela & Zer, Ilknur, 2016. "Model risk of risk models," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 79-91.
    12. Olatunji Abdul Shobande & Oladimeji Tomiwa Shodipe, 2021. "Monetary Policy Interdependency in Fisher Effect: A Comparative Evidence," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 10(1), pages 203-226.
    13. Famoroti Jonathan Olusegun & Adeleke Omolade, 2022. "Impact of monetary policy transmission mechanism in West African countries," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 32(1), pages 20-42, March.
    14. Ellis, Scott & Sharma, Satish & Brzeszczyński, Janusz, 2022. "Systemic risk measures and regulatory challenges," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    15. Puzanova, Natalia & Düllmann, Klaus, 2013. "Systemic risk contributions: A credit portfolio approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1243-1257.
    16. Silva, Walmir & Kimura, Herbert & Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim, 2017. "An analysis of the literature on systemic financial risk: A survey," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 91-114.
    17. Zhou, Chen, 2013. "The impact of imposing capital requirements on systemic risk," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 320-329.
    18. Jeremy Staum, 2012. "Systemic risk components and deposit insurance premia," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 651-662, January.
    19. André Cartapanis, 2011. "La crise financière et les politiques macroprudentielles. Inflexion réglementaire ou nouveau paradigme ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 62(3), pages 349-382.
    20. Dungey, Mardi & Flavin, Thomas & O'Connor, Thomas & Wosser, Michael, 2022. "Non-financial corporations and systemic risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Eigenvectors; Indonesia; Principal Component Analysis; Systemic Important Banking; Weighting;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • E52 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Monetary Policy
    • E58 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Central Banks and Their Policies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbk:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:2:p:155-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbmgvme.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.