IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v63y2017i1id263-2015-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic efficiency of suckler cow herds in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Jan SYRUCEK

    (Department of Cattle Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jindrich KVAPILIK

    (Department of Cattle Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Ludek BARTON

    (Department of Cattle Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Mojmir VACEK

    (Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Ludek STADNIK

    (Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the profitability of suckler cow herds located in different regions of the Czech Republic. Data on 2164 suckler cows were collected for 2013 from 20 beef farms using a questionnaire and the covered production, reproduction, and economic traits. Model calculations were used to determine the level of profitability with support payments either included (2.15%) or excluded (-45.5%). Break-even points defined as the points when the operation reaches zero profitability were estimated for the number of calves weaned and sold (81 calves/100 cows) and for the selling price of calves (54.6 CZK/kg). Fixed cost as a proportion of the total costs was reduced with the increasing herd size. Based on the results of a sensitivity analysis, the selling price for calves, the number of calves weaned the calving interval, and the amount of support payments were identified as the factors with the highest impact on the overall herd profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan SYRUCEK & Jindrich KVAPILIK & Ludek BARTON & Mojmir VACEK & Ludek STADNIK, 2017. "Economic efficiency of suckler cow herds in the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(1), pages 34-43.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:63:y:2017:i:1:id:263-2015-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/263/2015-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/263/2015-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/263/2015-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/263/2015-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pannell, David J., 1997. "Sensitivity analysis of normative economic models: theoretical framework and practical strategies," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 16(2), pages 139-152, May.
    2. P. Šafus & J. Přibyl & Z. Veselá & L. Vostrý & M. Štípková & L. Stádník, 2006. "Selection indexes for bulls of beef cattle," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(7), pages 285-298.
    3. Huan Zhao & Xiaodong Du & David Hennessy, 2011. "Pass-through in United States beef cattle prices: a test of Ricardian rent theory," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 497-508, April.
    4. Belasco, Eric J. & Schroeder, Ted C. & Goodwin, Barry K., 2010. "Quality Risk and Profitability in Cattle Production: A Multivariate Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 35(3), pages 1-21, December.
    5. M. Wolfová & J. Wolf & R. Zahrádková & J. Přibyl & J. Daňo & J. Kica, 2004. "Main sources of the economic efficiency of beef cattle production systems," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49(8), pages 357-372.
    6. Tomáš DOUCHA & Ivan Foltýn & Jaroslav HUMPÁL, 2012. "Profitability of dairy and suckler cows breeding on Czech farms," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(9), pages 397-408.
    7. F. Střeleček & P. Kollar, 2002. "Searching the proportional level of operating costs - specification of the minimum volume of production," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 106-116.
    8. Crosson, P. & O'Kiely, P. & O'Mara, F.P. & Wallace, M., 2006. "The development of a mathematical model to investigate Irish beef production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 89(2-3), pages 349-370, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Syrůček & Luděk Bartoň & Dalibor Řehák & Jindřich Kvapilík & Jiří Burdych, 2019. "Evaluation of economic indicators for Czech dairy farms," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(11), pages 499-508.
    2. Kopke, Emma & Kingwell, Ross S. & Young, John, 2005. "A farm-level economic assessment of the Australian Merino, Dohne Merino, and South African Meat Merino sheep breeds in southern Australia," 2005 Conference (49th), February 9-11, 2005, Coff's Harbour, Australia 137934, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. Guthrie, R. & Purse, Kevin & Lurie, P., 2006. "Workers' Compensation Western Australia; a Case Study 1993 - 2004," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 32(1), pages 62-73.
    4. Emile Noël, 1996. "Quelques réflexions sur les perspectives politico-institutionnelles de l'intégration européenne en 2000 et au-delà," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 39, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    5. Karin Fierke & Antje Wiener, 1999. "Constructing Institutional Interests: EU and NATO Enlargement," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 14, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    6. Leslie Holmes, 1997. "The Democratic State or State Democracy? Problems of Post-Communist Transition," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 48, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    7. Mustajoki, Jyri & Hamalainen, Raimo P. & Lindstedt, Mats R.K., 2006. "Using intervals for global sensitivity and worst-case analyses in multiattribute value trees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 278-292, October.
    8. Jackson, T.M. & Hanjra, Munir A. & Khan, S. & Hafeez, M.M., 2011. "Building a climate resilient farm: A risk based approach for understanding water, energy and emissions in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(9), pages 729-745.
    9. Janssen, Sander & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2007. "Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 622-636, June.
    10. Rodriguez Iglesias, 1996. "Le pouvoir judiciaire de la Communauté européenne au stade actuel de l'évolution de l'Union," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 41, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    11. Bennett, Anne L. & Pannell, David J., 1998. "Economic evaluation of a weed-activated sprayer for herbicide application to patchy weed populations," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(4), pages 1-20.
    12. McGee, M. & Lenehan, C. & Crosson, P. & O'Riordan, E.G. & Kelly, A.K. & Moran, L. & Moloney, A.P., 2022. "Performance, meat quality, profitability, and greenhouse gas emissions of suckler bulls from pasture-based compared to an indoor high-concentrate weanling-to-beef finishing system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    13. Stephen P. Chambal & Jeffery D. Weir & Yucel R. Kahraman & Alex J. Gutman, 2011. "A Practical Procedure for Customizable One-Way Sensitivity Analysis in Additive Value Models," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 303-321, December.
    14. Pannell, David J., 2004. "Effectively communicating economics to policy makers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(3), pages 1-21.
    15. Abbie A. Rogers & Fiona L. Dempster & Jacob I. Hawkins & Robert J. Johnston & Peter C. Boxall & John Rolfe & Marit E. Kragt & Michael P. Burton & David J. Pannell, 2019. "Valuing non-market economic impacts from natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 1131-1161, November.
    16. Ay, Jean-Sauveur & Latruffe, Laure, 2013. "The Empirical Content of the Present Value Model: A survey of the instrumental uses of farmland prices," Working papers 157112, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    17. Andre Liebich, 1998. "Ethnic Minorities and Long-Term Implications of EU Enlargement," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 49, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    18. Chudleigh, Fred & Cox, Howard W. & Chapman, Veronica J., 2002. "Modelling profitable and sustainable farming systems in Central Queensland," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 125070, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    19. Sloane, Peter J, 2010. "Symposium 7: The Fair Work Australia Minimum Wage Decision Viewed From Afar," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 36(3), pages 346-350.
    20. M. Šprysl & J. Čítek & R. Stupka, 2010. "Interaction of selected production indicators of the economics of pork production," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 1-10.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:63:y:2017:i:1:id:263-2015-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.