IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bor/bistre/v15y2015i3p213-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Closing price manipulation in Borsa Istanbul and the impact of call auction sessions

Author

Listed:
  • Eyup Kadioðluu
  • Guray Kuçukkocaoglu
  • Saim Kilic

Abstract

To reduce extraordinary price movement and to ensure more effective price formation at closing time, Borsa Istanbul implemented closing call auction sessions on March 2, 2012. This study tests the effect of closing call auction sessions on closing price manipulation in Borsa Istanbul using 102 shares in various indexes. The analysis focuses on 624 days from November 1, 2006 to May 31, 2012. The results reveal an upward-oriented closing price manipulation prior to the implementation of closing call auction sessions. The data show a significant elimination in closing price manipulation following the implementation of closing call auction sessions.

Suggested Citation

  • Eyup Kadioðluu & Guray Kuçukkocaoglu & Saim Kilic, 2015. "Closing price manipulation in Borsa Istanbul and the impact of call auction sessions," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 15(3), pages 213-221, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bor:bistre:v:15:y:2015:i:3:p:213-221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845015000162
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meifen Qian & Chongbo Xu & Bin Yu, 2014. "Performance Manipulation and Fund Flow: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 221-239, May.
    2. Lee, Chun I & Mathur, Ike, 1999. "The Influence of Information Arrival on Market Microstructure: Evidence from Three Related Markets," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 34(1), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Robert F. Engle & Magdalena E. Sokalska, 0. "Forecasting intraday volatility in the US equity market. Multiplicative component GARCH," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 54-83.
    4. Comerton-Forde, Carole & Rydge, James, 2006. "Call auction algorithm design and market manipulation," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 184-198, April.
    5. Theissen, Erik, 2000. "Market structure, informational efficiency and liquidity: An experimental comparison of auction and dealer markets," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 333-363, November.
    6. Wael Louhichi, 2012. "Does trading activity contain information to predict stock returns? Evidence from Euronext Paris," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 625-632, April.
    7. Muscarella, Chris J. & Piwowar, Michael S., 2001. "Market microstructure and securities values: : Evidence from the Paris Bourse," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 209-229, June.
    8. Yu Chuan Huang & Shu Hui Chan, 2014. "The Trading Behavior of Attention Securities with Different Closing Mechanisms: Evidence from Taiwan," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1-16.
    9. Yigit Atilgan & Turan G. Bali & K. Ozgur Demirtas, 2013. "The performance of hedge fund indices," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 13(3), pages 30-52, September.
    10. Hillion, Pierre & Suominen, Matti, 2004. "The manipulation of closing prices," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 351-375, October.
    11. Harris, Lawrence, 1989. "A Day-End Transaction Price Anomaly," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 29-45, March.
    12. Comerton-Forde, Carole & Putnins, Talis J., 2011. "Measuring closing price manipulation," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 135-158, April.
    13. Barclay, Michael J & Litzenberger, Robert H & Warner, Jerold B, 1990. "Private Information, Trading Volume, and Stock-Return Variances," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 3(2), pages 233-253.
    14. John F. Pinfold & Danyang He, 2012. "The impact of introducing a pre‐close on the New Zealand share market," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 99-110, February.
    15. Cushing, David & Madhavan, Ananth, 2000. "Stock returns and trading at the close," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 45-67, February.
    16. Comerton-Forde, Carole & Ting Lau, Sie & McInish, Thomas, 2007. "Opening and closing behavior following the introduction of call auctions in Singapore," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 18-35, January.
    17. Yu Chuan Huang & Pei Lin Tsai, 2008. "Effectiveness of Closing Call Auctions: Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Exchange," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 5-20, May.
    18. Felixson, Karl & Pelli, Anders, 1999. "Day end returns--stock price manipulation," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 95-127, March.
    19. Waël Louhichi, 2012. "Does trading activity contain information to predict stock returns ? Evidence from Euronext Paris," Post-Print halshs-00715964, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chan, Shu Hui & Huang, Yu Chuan & Lin, Sheng-Min, 2020. "Market transparency and closing price behavior on month-end days: Evidence from Taiwan," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    2. Kadıoğlu, Eyüp & Frömmel, Michael, 2022. "Manipulation in the bond market and the role of investment funds: Evidence from an emerging market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Jiayi Li & Sumei Luo & Guangyou Zhou, 2021. "Call auction, continuous trading and closing price formation," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 1037-1065, June.
    4. Imisiker, Serkan & Tas, Bedri Kamil Onur, 2018. "Wash trades as a stock market manipulation tool," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 92-98.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kadıoğlu, Eyüp & Frömmel, Michael, 2022. "Manipulation in the bond market and the role of investment funds: Evidence from an emerging market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Alfred Ma, 2022. "Profitability of technical trading strategies under market manipulation," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Park, Seongkyu “Gilbert” & Suen, Wing & Wan, Kam-Ming, 2022. "Call auction design and closing price manipulation: Evidence from the Hong Kong stock exchange," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Jiayi Li & Sumei Luo & Guangyou Zhou, 2021. "Call auction, continuous trading and closing price formation," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 1037-1065, June.
    5. Chan, Shu Hui & Huang, Yu Chuan & Lin, Sheng-Min, 2020. "Market transparency and closing price behavior on month-end days: Evidence from Taiwan," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    6. Christos Alexakis & Vasileios Pappas & Emmanouil Skarmeas, 2021. "Market abuse under different close price determination mechanisms: A European case," Post-Print hal-03182927, HAL.
    7. Alexakis, Christos & Pappas, Vasileios & Skarmeas, Emmanouil, 2021. "Market abuse under different close price determination mechanisms: A European case," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Chang, Rosita P. & Rhee, S. Ghon & Stone, Gregory R. & Tang, Ning, 2008. "How does the call market method affect price efficiency? Evidence from the Singapore Stock Market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 2205-2219, October.
    9. Tālis J. Putniņš, 2012. "Market Manipulation: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 952-967, December.
    10. Ya‐Kai Chang & Robin K. Chou & J. Jimmy Yang, 2020. "A rare move: The effects of switching from a closing call auction to a continuous trading," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(3), pages 308-328, March.
    11. Tsung-Yu Hsieh, 2015. "Information disclosure and price manipulation during the pre-closing session: evidence from an order-driven market," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(43), pages 4670-4684, September.
    12. Comerton-Forde, Carole & Rydge, James, 2006. "The influence of call auction algorithm rules on market efficiency," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 199-222, May.
    13. Yu Chuan Huang & Shu Hui Chan, 2014. "The Trading Behavior of Attention Securities with Different Closing Mechanisms: Evidence from Taiwan," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1-16.
    14. John F. Pinfold & Danyang He, 2012. "The impact of introducing a pre‐close on the New Zealand share market," Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 99-110, February.
    15. Michael Aitken & Frederick Harris & Shan Ji, 2015. "A Worldwide Examination of Exchange Market Quality: Greater Integrity Increases Market Efficiency," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 147-170, November.
    16. Comerton-Forde, Carole & Rydge, James, 2006. "Call auction algorithm design and market manipulation," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 184-198, April.
    17. Giuseppe Attanasi & Samuele Centorrino & Ivan Moscati, 2011. "Double Auction Equilibrium and Efficiency in a Classroom Experimental Search Market," LERNA Working Papers 11.03.337, LERNA, University of Toulouse.
    18. Silvio John Camilleri & Christopher J. Green, 2009. "The impact of the suspension of opening and closing call auctions: evidence from the National Stock Exchange of India," International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 257-284.
    19. Camilleri, Silvio John, 2015. "Do call auctions curtail price volatility? Evidence from the National Stock Exchange of India," MPRA Paper 95301, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Zhi-Qiang Jiang & Wen-Jie Xie & Xiong Xiong & Wei Zhang & Yong-Jie Zhang & W. -X. Zhou, 2012. "Trading networks, abnormal motifs and stock manipulation," Papers 1301.0007, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Closing price; Call auction; Manipulation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bor:bistre:v:15:y:2015:i:3:p:213-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ahmet Palu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rdisetr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.