Whatever the reasons at work - differences in locational endowments and/or externalities - a unit of capital is expected to be diversely productive according to the region where it is installed. This article determines which and the extent to which a regional policy could be implemented in order to make up for a productivity handicap. The model allows for comparing the efficiency of a productivity-enhancing instrument (a publicly provided input) with that of instruments that affect capital cost (a lower corporate tax rate, an investment tax credit, or a capital subsidy). The approach is illustrated in the contemporaneous context of France. Copyright (c) 2008 the author(s). Journal compilation (c) 2008 RSAI.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)