IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/metroe/v73y2022i4p1021-1047.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General equilibrium and the neo‐Ricardian critique: On Bloise and Reichlin

Author

Listed:
  • Fabio Petri

Abstract

The 2009 article by Professors Bloise and Reichlin offers the opportunity to clarify the ‘neo‐Ricardian’ critique, which is not fully grasped by the two authors. Bloise and Reichlin identify long‐period analysis with steady states, which obscures the relevance of the supply‐side problems of the conception of capital as a single factor. Also, they seem not to grasp how indefensible intertemporal general equilibrium theory is, because of the impermanence problem and of the absurdity of perfect foresight of novelties. But in fact the acceptance of neoclassical theory rests, not on general equilibrium theory, but on faith in the traditional marginalist adjustments based on capital conceived as a single factor—a conception destroyed by the neo‐Ricardian critique, which therefore destroys the entire neoclassical approach. This critique points to problems which are logically prior to the instability issues to which Bloise and Reichlin reduce the critique; stability can be discussed only under ‘even‐conceding’ assumptions (illustrative examples are Marshall, and Fratini).

Suggested Citation

  • Fabio Petri, 2022. "General equilibrium and the neo‐Ricardian critique: On Bloise and Reichlin," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(4), pages 1021-1047, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:metroe:v:73:y:2022:i:4:p:1021-1047
    DOI: 10.1111/meca.12389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12389
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/meca.12389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabio Petri, 2013. "The Inevitable Dependence of Investment on Expected Demand: Implications for Neoclassical Macroeconomics," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Enrico Sergio Levrero & Antonella Palumbo & Antonella Stirati (ed.), Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory: Volume Two, chapter 2, pages 44-67, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Bliss, Christopher, 1983. "Two Views of Macroeconomics," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Edmond Malinvaud, 2003. "Réformes structurelles du marché du travail et politiques macroéconomiques," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 86(3), pages 7-30.
    4. Ariel Dvoskin, 2016. "An unpleasant dilemma for contemporary general equilibrium theory," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 198-225, April.
    5. Garegnani, Pierangelo, 1979. "Notes on Consumption, Investment and Effective Demand: II," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 3(1), pages 63-82, March.
    6. Fabio Petri, 2015. "Neglected Implications of Neoclassical Capital-Labour Substitution for Investment Theory: Another Criticism of Say's Law," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 308-340, July.
    7. Mas-Colell, Andreu & Whinston, Michael D. & Green, Jerry R., 1995. "Microeconomic Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195102680.
    8. Paul A. Samuelson, 1966. "A Summing Up," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 80(4), pages 568-583.
    9. Saverio M. Fratini, 2013. "Real W icksell Effect, Demand for Capital and Stability," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 346-360, May.
    10. Burmeister,Edwin, 1980. "Capital Theory and Dynamics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521297035.
    11. Bliss, Christopher, 1999. "The Real Rate of Interest: A Theoretical Analysis," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 15(2), pages 46-58, Summer.
    12. Potestio, Paola, 1999. "The aggregate neoclassical theory of distribution and the concept of a given value of capital: towards a more general critique," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3-4), pages 381-394, December.
    13. Fabio Petri, 2017. "The Passage of Time, Capital, and Investment in Traditional and in Recent Neoclassical Value Theory," Department of Economics University of Siena 750, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    14. Pierangelo Garegnani, 2013. "On the Present State of the Capital Controversy," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Enrico Sergio Levrero & Antonella Palumbo & Antonella Stirati (ed.), Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory: Volume One, chapter 1, pages 15-37, Palgrave Macmillan.
    15. Gaetano Bloise & Pietro Reichlin, 2009. "An Obtrusive Remark On Capital And Comparative Statics," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 54-76, February.
    16. Ariel Dvoskin & Fabio Petri, 2017. "Again on the Relevance of Reverse Capital Deepening and Reswitching," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 625-659, November.
    17. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1988. "On the mechanics of economic development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 3-42, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ariel Dvoskin & Fabio Petri, 2017. "Again on the Relevance of Reverse Capital Deepening and Reswitching," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 625-659, November.
    2. Saverio M. Fratini, 2019. "Neoclassical theories of stationary relative prices and the supply of capital," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(4), pages 723-737, November.
    3. Fabio Petri, 2017. "The Passage of Time, Capital, and Investment in Traditional and in Recent Neoclassical Value Theory," Department of Economics University of Siena 750, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    4. Fabio Petri, 2021. "None so deaf as those that will not hear: on Garegnani’s contributions to the capital-theoretic critique and the resistances to accepting them," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 15(2), pages 187-207, December.
    5. Petri, Fabio, 2021. "What Remains of the Cambridge Critique? On Professor Schefold's Theses," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP50, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    6. Kazuhiro Kurose & Naoki Yoshihara, 2016. "The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model and the Cambridge Capital Controversies," DSSR Discussion Papers 58, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    7. Alessandro Morselli, 2022. "An Institutionalist-Conventionalist Approach to the Process of Economic Change," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 411-428.
    8. J. Barkley Rosser, 2020. "Austrian themes and the Cambridge capital theory controversies," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 415-431, December.
    9. Saverio M. Fratini, 2015. "A Note on Reswitching and Intertemporal Prices," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 666-678, October.
    10. Saverio M. Fratini, 2019. "On The Second Stage Of The Cambridge Capital Controversy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1073-1093, September.
    11. Ariel Dvoskin & Fabio Petri, 2015. "Again on the relevance of reverse capital deepening and reswitching," Department of Economics University of Siena 710, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    12. Shaukat, Badiea & Zhu, Qigui & Khan, M. Ijaz, 2019. "Real interest rate and economic growth: A statistical exploration for transitory economies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    13. Miklós Koren & Silvana Tenreyro, 2013. "Technological Diversification," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(1), pages 378-414, February.
    14. Gaetano Bloise & Pietro Reichlin, 2009. "An Obtrusive Remark On Capital And Comparative Statics," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 54-76, February.
    15. Hosseiny, Ali & Gallegati, Mauro, 2017. "Role of intensive and extensive variables in a soup of firms in economy to address long run prices and aggregate data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 470(C), pages 51-59.
    16. Robert Becker, 2004. "Optimal growth with many sectors Franz Gehrels Peter Lang GmbH, 2002, 176 pp," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 32(2), pages 150-155, June.
    17. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 2000. "Critique of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 383-431.
    18. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 2000. "Critique of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 383-431.
    19. Saverio M. Fratini, 2013. "Malinvaud on Wicksell’s Legacy to Capital Theory: Some Critical Remarks," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Enrico Sergio Levrero & Antonella Palumbo & Antonella Stirati (ed.), Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory: Volume One, chapter 5, pages 105-128, Palgrave Macmillan.
    20. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2017. "Discrimination and Inequality in an Integrated Walrasian-General-Equilibrium and Neoclassical-Growth Theory," Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(1), pages 57-76, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:metroe:v:73:y:2022:i:4:p:1021-1047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0026-1386 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.