Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The Dilemma of the Prisoners' Dilemmas

Contents:

Author Info

  • G. Daniel
  • M. Arce
  • Todd Sandler

Abstract

Dieser Aufsatz unterscheidet vier Arten des Gefangenendilemmaspiels -öffentliche Güter, Allmen-degüter, Egoismus und Altruismus - aufgrund des �ffentlichkeitsgrads der Kosten und Nutzen. Ob-wohl jedes dieser Spiele die gleiche 2 � 2 ordinale Spielform hat, unterscheiden sie sich hinsichtlich ihrer strategischen, dynamischen und politischen Auswirkungen. �hnliche Unterschiede weisen diese Spiele im n-Personen Fall auf. Wenn diese in 3 � 3 Versionen gepaart werden, resultiert das am wenigsten wünschenswerte Nash Gleichgewicht der zwei eingebetteten 2 � 2 Spiele. Die vier Versi-onen des Gefangenendilemmas haben auch unterschiedliche Evolutions- und Informationsbedingun-gen für Kooperation. Anwendungen finden sich u.a. in den Bereichen Umwelt, Biologie, Terroris-musbekämpfung und internationale Beziehungen. Copyright 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd..

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2005.00275.x
File Function: link to full text
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Wiley Blackwell in its journal Kyklos.

Volume (Year): 58 (2005)
Issue (Month): 1 (02)
Pages: 3-24

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:58:y:2005:i:1:p:3-24

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962

Order Information:
Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0023-5962

Related research

Keywords:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Pittel, Karen & Rübbelke, Dirk T. G., 2012. "Transitions in the negotiations on climate change: From prisoner’s dilemma to chicken and beyond," Munich Reprints in Economics 19343, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
  2. Daniel Arce & Sneha Bakshi & Rachel Croson & Catherine Eckel & Enrique Fatas & Malcolm Kass, 2011. "Counterterrorism strategies in the lab," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 465-478, December.
  3. Vincy Fon & Francesco Parisi, 2008. "Matching rules," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 57-70.
  4. Arce, Daniel G. & Sandler, Todd, 2009. "Fitting in: Group effects and the evolution of fundamentalism," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 739-757, September.
  5. Daniel G. Arce M, 2005. "Subgame perfection and the ethics of competition," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(6), pages 397-405.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:58:y:2005:i:1:p:3-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.