IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jemstr/v25y2016i1p161-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing the Quality of the Fit between Complementary Products

Author

Listed:
  • Maxim Sinitsyn

Abstract

In this paper, I examine how firms should position their complementary products. I assume that there are two competing firms, each producing two complementary products. Each firm decides whether to employ strategies that enhance the quality of the fit (the degree of complementarity) between its pair of complementary products before competing in prices. The consumers have heterogeneous tastes for the four possible bundles. They are willing to pay a price premium in order to purchase a bundle from the same firm if this firm chose to make such bundle more attractive. I find that increasing the degree of complementarity between a firm's complementary products intensifies price competition and often leads to smaller profits. Only when complementarity‐enhancing strategies significantly increase the demand for a firm's matching bundle, does the firm benefit from employing them. The highest profits for both firms are obtained when both firms do not employ complementarity‐enhancing strategies. Deteriorating the quality of the fit between one's own and a rival's complementary products is never profitable.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxim Sinitsyn, 2016. "Choosing the Quality of the Fit between Complementary Products," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 161-178, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:25:y:2016:i:1:p:161-178
    DOI: 10.1111/jems.12136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12136
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jems.12136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan Rahinel & Joseph P. Redden, 2013. "Brands as Product Coordinators: Matching Brands Make Joint Consumption Experiences More Enjoyable," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(6), pages 1290-1299.
    2. Simonin, Bernard L. & Ruth, Julie A., 1995. "Bundling as a strategy for new product introduction: Effects on consumers' reservation prices for the bundle, the new product, and its tie-in," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 219-230, July.
    3. Ma, Yu & Seetharaman, P.B. & Narasimhan, Chakravarthi, 2012. "Modeling Dependencies in Brand Choice Outcomes Across Complementary Categories," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 47-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoonju Han & Sandeep R. Chandukala & Hai Che, 2017. "Exchange and refund of complementary products," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 113-125, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maxim Sinitsyn, 2012. "Coordination of Price Promotions in Complementary Categories," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(11), pages 2076-2094, November.
    2. Agarwal, Manoj K. & Frambach, Ruud T. & Stremersch, Stefan, 2000. "Does size matter? : disentangling consumers' bundling preferences," Serie Research Memoranda 0033, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    3. Sheng, Shibin & Pan, Yue, 2009. "Bundling as a new product introduction strategy: The role of brand image and bundle features," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 367-376.
    4. Chan, Tat Y. & Narasimhan, Chakravarthi & Yoon, Yeujun, 2017. "Advertising and price competition in a manufacturer-retailer channel," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 694-716.
    5. Koray Cosguner & Tat Y. Chan & P. B. (Seethu) Seetharaman, 2018. "Dynamic Pricing in a Distribution Channel in the Presence of Switching Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1212-1229, March.
    6. Thomas M. Fojcik & Heike Proff, 2014. "Accelerating market diffusion of battery electric vehicles through alternative mobility concepts," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3/4), pages 347-368.
    7. Lee, Misuk & Cho, Youngsang, 2015. "Consumer perception of a new convergence product: A theoretical and empirical approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 312-321.
    8. Khandeparkar, Kapil & Motiani, Manoj, 2020. "The effect of alcohol consumption and contextual cues on the evaluation of new brands of alcoholic beverages at the POS," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    9. Kim, Hwang & Rao, Vithala R., 2023. "A comparison of online recommendation methods: Simultaneous versus sequential approaches," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 210-227.
    10. Kevin Lane Keller, 2016. "Reflections on customer-based brand equity: perspectives, progress, and priorities," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Smith, Robert W. & Keller, Kevin Lane, 2021. "If all their products seem the same, all the parts within a product seem the same too: How brand homogeneity polarizes product experiences," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 698-714.
    12. Srinuan, Pratompong & Srinuan, Chalita & Bohlin, Erik, 2011. "Would you prefer a set menu or à la carte? An empirical study of multiple services and choices of consumer in the Swedish telecommunications market," 22nd European Regional ITS Conference, Budapest 2011: Innovative ICT Applications - Emerging Regulatory, Economic and Policy Issues 52163, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    13. Timothy J. Richards, 2017. "Analysis of Umbrella Branding with Crowdsourced Data," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 135-150, April.
    14. Ali Azadeh & Hassan Songhori & Nima Salehi, 2017. "A unique optimization model for deterministic bundle pricing of two products with limited stock," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1154-1160, November.
    15. Mikkonen, Karri & Niskanen, Hanna & Pynnönen, Mikko & Hallikas, Jukka, 2015. "The presence of emotional factors: An empirical exploration of bundle purchasing process," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 642-657.
    16. Hongju Liu & Qiang Liu & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2017. "Promotion Spillovers: Drug Detailing in Combination Therapy," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 382-401, May.
    17. Namin, Aidin & Dehdashti, Yashar, 2019. "A “hidden†side of consumer grocery shopping choice," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 16-27.
    18. Karray, Salma & Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Zaccour, Georges, 2020. "Pricing of demand-related products: Can ignoring cross-category effect be a smart choice?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    19. Gelper, Sarah & Wilms, Ines & Croux, Christophe, 2016. "Identifying Demand Effects in a Large Network of Product Categories," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 25-39.
    20. Kim, Moon-Koo & Park, Myeong-Cheol & Lee, Duk Hee & Park, Jong-Hyun, 2017. "Determinants of the subscription to bundled services and their effect on customer retention in the Korean communications sector," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168501, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jemstr:v:25:y:2016:i:1:p:161-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/research/journals/JEMS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.