IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v55y2021i1p118-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Envisioning a community‐centric approach to impact assessments in subsistence marketplaces

Author

Listed:
  • Srinivas Venugopal

Abstract

What does a community‐centric approach to impact assessment look like? That is the central question addressed in this article. Our community‐centric perspective provides an alternative to discipline‐centric approaches to impact assessment that emphasize specific methodological gold‐standards (e.g., randomized controlled trials [RCTs] in development economics). Disciplinary approaches to impact assessment owe their principal allegiance to the discipline's knowledge‐creation norms. Consequently, the concerns, interests, and voices of community members are not fully captured in the impact assessment process. In this article, we flip the conventional perspective to offer a community‐centric view of impact assessment that places the concerns, interests and voices of community members front and center. We present the case for why we need a community‐centric approach to impact assessment and clarify its axiological content, theoretical perspective, and methodological stance. Specifically, we advocate for a relational axiology, a system‐theoretic perspective, and a phenomenological methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Srinivas Venugopal, 2021. "Envisioning a community‐centric approach to impact assessments in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 118-133, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:55:y:2021:i:1:p:118-133
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.12349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12349
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.12349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julie L. Ozanne & Bige Saatcioglu, 2008. "Participatory Action Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(3), pages 423-439, March.
    2. Anaka Aiyar & Srinivas Venugopal, 2020. "Addressing the Ethical Challenge of Market Inclusion in Base-of-the-Pyramid Markets: A Macromarketing Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 243-260, June.
    3. Robert M. Townsend, 2016. "Village and Larger Economies: The Theory and Measurement of the Townsend Thai Project," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(4), pages 199-220, Fall.
    4. Brennan Davis & Julie L. Ozanne, 2018. "Risky Research? How Relational Engagement in Research Can Mitigate Harm and Enhance Benefits," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(1), pages 7-15.
    5. Venugopal, Srinivas & Gau, Roland & Appau, Samuelson & Sample, Kevin L. & Pereira, Rita C.F., 2019. "Adapting traditional livelihood practices in the face of environmental disruptions in subsistence communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 400-409.
    6. Corus, Canan & Ozanne, Julie L., 2012. "Stakeholder engagement: Building participatory and deliberative spaces in subsistence markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 1728-1735.
    7. Steinfield, Laurel & Sanghvi, Minita & Zayer, Linda Tuncay & Coleman, Catherine A. & Ourahmoune, Nacima & Harrison, Robert L. & Hein, Wendy & Brace-Govan, Jan, 2019. "Transformative intersectionality: Moving business towards a critical praxis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 366-375.
    8. Natalie Ross Adkins & Julie L. Ozanne, 2005. "The Low Literate Consumer," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(1), pages 93-105, June.
    9. Christopher B. Barrett & Michael R. Carter, 2010. "The Power and Pitfalls of Experiments in Development Economics: Some Non-random Reflections," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(4), pages 515-548.
    10. Ronald Hill & Justine Rapp, 2009. "Globalization and Poverty: Oxymoron or New Possibilities?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 39-47, February.
    11. Thompson, Craig J & Locander, William B & Pollio, Howard R, 1989. "Putting Consumer Experience Back into Consumer Research: The Philosophy and Method of Existential-Phenomenology," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(2), pages 133-146, September.
    12. Erik Simanis & Stuart Hart & Duncan Duke, 2008. "The Base of the Pyramid Protocol: Beyond "Basic Needs" Business Strategies," Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 3(1), pages 57-84, January.
    13. Oana Branzei & Samer Abdelnour, 2010. "Another day, another dollar: Enterprise resilience under terrorism in developing countries," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(5), pages 804-825, June.
    14. Edward Miguel & Michael Kremer, 2004. "Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 159-217, January.
    15. Julie L. Ozanne & Bige Saatcioglu & Canan Corus, 2009. "The Philosophy and Methods of Deliberative Democracy: Implications for Public Policy and Marketing," Post-Print hal-00491678, HAL.
    16. Bige Saatcioglu & Julie L. Ozanne, 2013. "Moral Habitus and Status Negotiation in a Marginalized Working-Class Neighborhood," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(4), pages 692-710.
    17. Elliot, Esi Abbam & Jamal, Ahmad & Cherian, Joseph, 2018. "Artrepreneurship and learning in ethnic markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 391-399.
    18. Justine Rapp Farrell & Ronald Paul Hill, 2018. "Poverty Research and Measurement: Making the Case for Consumption Adequacy," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 770-791, November.
    19. Minna Halme & Arno Kourula & Sara Lindeman & Galina Kallio & Maria Lima‐Toivanen & Angelina Korsunova, 2016. "Sustainability Innovation at the Base of the Pyramid through Multi‐Sited Rapid Ethnography," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 113-128, March.
    20. Hill, Ronald Paul, 1991. "Homeless Women, Special Possessions, and the Meaning of "Home": An Ethnographic Case Study," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(3), pages 298-310, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beninger, Stefanie & Francis, June N.P., 2022. "Resources for business resilience in a COVID-19 world: A community-centric approach," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 227-238.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martina Hutton & Canan Corus & Joshua Dorsey & Elizabeth Minton & Caroline Roux & Christopher P. Blocker & Jonathan Z. Zhang, 2022. "Getting real about consumer poverty: Deep processes for transformative action," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1332-1355, September.
    2. Ronald Paul Hill, 2020. "Freedom of the Will and Consumption Restrictions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 311-324, June.
    3. Cheryl Nakata & Elif Izberk-Bilgin & Lisa Sharp & Jelena Spanjol & Anna Shaojie Cui & Stephanie Y. Crawford & Yazhen Xiao, 2019. "Chronic illness medication compliance: a liminal and contextual consumer journey," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 192-215, March.
    4. Madhubalan Viswanathan & Robert Alfonso Arias & Arun Sreekumar, 2021. "Extreme exclusion and relative deprivation in subsistence marketplaces: A study in a refugee settlement in Nakivale, Uganda," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 87-117, March.
    5. Sujit Raghunathrao Jagadale & Jayne Krisjanous, 2023. "Exploring unheard voices: Best practices in interviewing women prosumers in Indian subsistence contexts," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 36-68, January.
    6. Shobod Deba Nath & Kazi Md. Jamshed & Javed M. Shaikh, 2022. "The impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on subsistence consumers' well‐being and coping strategies: Insights from India and Bangladesh," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 180-210, March.
    7. Ronald Paul Hill & Daniel Cunningham & Gramercy Gentlemen, 2016. "Dehumanization and Restriction inside a Maximum Security Prison: Novel Insights about Consumer Acquisition and Ownership," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 295-313.
    8. Stéphane J. Baele, 2013. "The ethics of New Development Economics: is the Experimental Approach to Development Economics morally wrong?," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 7(1), November.
    9. Monica C. LaBarge & Martin Pyle, 2020. "Staying in “the works of living”: How older adults employ marketplace resources to age successfully," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 742-774, June.
    10. Baldwin, Kate & Bhavnani, Rikhil R., 2013. "Ancillary Experiments: Opportunities and Challenges," WIDER Working Paper Series 024, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Hong, Soonkwan & Vicdan, Handan, 2016. "Re-imagining the utopian: Transformation of a sustainable lifestyle in ecovillages," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 120-136.
    12. Edward Asiedu & Dean Karlan & Monica Lambon-Quayefio & Christopher Udry, 2021. "A call for structured ethics appendices in social science papers," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118(29), pages 2024570118-, July.
    13. Elliot, Esi Abbam & Cavazos, Carmina, 2021. "Artrepreneurship and transmodernity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 722-734.
    14. James W. Gentry & Robert A. Mittelstaedt, 2017. "The Rapidly Aging World: Implications For Marketing," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(3_suppl), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Stephen G. Saunders & Srinivas Sridharan & Dani J. Barrington & Regina Souter & Katherine F. Shields & Semisi Meo & Jamie K. Bartram, 2021. "Consumer marketplaces and self‐sufficiency: Meeting consumption needs in community," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 1691-1711, December.
    16. Andrew Bryant & Ronald Paul Hill, 2019. "Poverty, consumption, and counterintuitive behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 233-243, December.
    17. Mattoo, Aaditya & Cadot, Olivier & Gourdon, Julien & Fernandes, Ana Margarida, 2011. "Impact Evaluation of Trade Interventions: Paving the Way," CEPR Discussion Papers 8638, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Baldwin Kate & Bhavnani Rikhil R., 2015. "Ancillary Studies of Experiments: Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 113-146, June.
    19. Corus, Canan & Ozanne, Julie L., 2012. "Stakeholder engagement: Building participatory and deliberative spaces in subsistence markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 1728-1735.
    20. Florent Bédécarrats & Isabelle Guérin & François Roubaud, 2019. "All that Glitters is not Gold. The Political Economy of Randomized Evaluations in Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(3), pages 735-762, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:55:y:2021:i:1:p:118-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.