IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v10y2001i1p38-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate environmental behaviour – a comparison between Nordic and US firms

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Lindell
  • Necmi Karagozoglu

Abstract

The green challenge will be one of the key strategic issues facing businesses in the coming decades. Some argue that it is important for mankind as a whole. In this article the opinions of Nordic and US managers on environmental matters are investigated and compared. A questionnaire was sent to senior managers mainly in four industries: forest and paper, electronics, telecommunications and the printing industry. The results show that US managers perceive government laws and actions to be more stringent than Nordic managers do and the time to adapt was felt to be too short. There were no differences between the two regions in the degree of pro‐activeness and environmental innovation. However US managers reported a shortage of skilled labour. Managers both in the Nordic countries and the USA considered themselves to be ahead of their competitors in environmental actions. Nordic managers were much more positive toward the competitive effects and profitability of environmental measures than their US counterparts. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Lindell & Necmi Karagozoglu, 2001. "Corporate environmental behaviour – a comparison between Nordic and US firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 38-52, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:10:y:2001:i:1:p:38-52
    DOI: 10.1002/1099-0836(200101/02)10:13.0.CO;2-C
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0836(200101/02)10:13.0.CO;2-C
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1099-0836(200101/02)10:13.0.CO;2-C?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Halme, Minna & Huse, Morten, 1997. "The influence of corporate governance, industry and country factors on environmental reporting," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 137-157, June.
    2. Larsson, Rikard & Olsson-Tjärnemo, Heléne & Plogner, Ann-Charlotte & Östlund, Susanne, 1996. "Market pull or legislative push: A framework for strategic ecological reorientation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 305-315, September.
    3. Henriques, Irene & Sadorsky, Perry, 1996. "The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 381-395, May.
    4. Andersson, Tommy & Wolff, Rolf, 1996. "Ecology as a challenge for management research," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 223-231, September.
    5. Peattie, Ken & Ringer, Anja, 1994. "Management and the environment in the UK and Germany: A comparison," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 216-225, June.
    6. Paul Shrivastava, 1995. "Environmental technologies and competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(S1), pages 183-200.
    7. L. G. Thomas III & Geoffrey Waring, 1999. "Competing capitalisms: capital investment in American, German, and Japanese firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(8), pages 729-748, August.
    8. Ulhøi, J. P. & Madsen, H. & Hildebrandt, S., 1996. "Green new world: A corporate environmental business perspective," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 243-254, September.
    9. Dobers, Peter, 1996. "Legislation-induced bubble markets: Driving forces of air pollution control technology in the field of waste incineration," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 255-273, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Farida Saleem & Saiqa Saddiqa Qureshi & Muhammad Imran Malik, 2021. "Impact of Environmental Orientation on Proactive and Reactive Environmental Strategies: Mediating Role of Business Environmental Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Neelam C. Poudyal & Jacek P. Siry & J. M. Bowker, 2012. "Stakeholders' Engagement in Promoting Sustainable Development: Businesses and Urban Forest Carbon," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 157-169, March.
    3. Frances Drake & Martin Purvis & Jane Hunt, 2004. "Meeting the environmental challenge: a case of win–win or lose–win? A study of the UK baking and refrigeration industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 172-186, May.
    4. R. Scott Marshall & Darrell Brown, 2003. "Corporate environmental reporting: what's in a metric?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 87-106, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "Enhance environmental commitments and green intangible assets toward green competitive advantages: an analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM)," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 529-543, January.
    2. Hidemichi Fujii & Kimbara Tatsuo, 2012. "Environmental Management Mechanisms in U.S. and Japanese Manufacturing Firms," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(6), pages 13-24, November.
    3. Beatriz Junquera & Jesús Ángel Del Brío, 2016. "Preventive Command and Control Regulation: A Case Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Kyungho Kim, 2018. "Proactive versus Reactive Corporate Environmental Practices and Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Natalia Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana & Javier Aguilera‐Caracuel & Matilde Morales‐Raya, 2016. "Corporate Governance and Environmental Sustainability: The Moderating Role of the National Institutional Context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 150-164, May.
    6. Sarmento, Manuela & Durão, Diamantino & Duarte, Manuela, 2006. "Analysis of companies’ environmental strategies for a green society," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(13), pages 2333-2340.
    7. Sarmento, Manuela & Durão, Diamantino & Duarte, Manuela, 2005. "Study of enviromental sustainability: The case of Portuguese polluting industries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1247-1257.
    8. Noushi Rahman & Corinne Post, 2012. "Measurement Issues in Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR): Toward a Transparent, Reliable, and Construct Valid Instrument," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 307-319, February.
    9. Javier Aguilera-Caracuel & Juan Aragón-Correa & Nuria Hurtado-Torres & Alan Rugman, 2012. "The Effects of Institutional Distance and Headquarters’ Financial Performance on the Generation of Environmental Standards in Multinational Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(4), pages 461-474, February.
    10. Marie‐Josée Roy & Olivier Boiral & Denis Lagacé, 2001. "Environmental commitment and manufacturing excellence: a comparative study within Canadian industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(5), pages 257-268, September.
    11. Doonan, Julie & Lanoie, Paul & Laplante, Benoit, 2005. "Determinants of environmental performance in the Canadian pulp and paper industry: An assessment from inside the industry," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 73-84, October.
    12. Neubaum, Donald O. & Dibrell, Clay & Craig, Justin B., 2012. "Balancing natural environmental concerns of internal and external stakeholders in family and non-family businesses," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 28-37.
    13. Théophile AZOMAHOU & Phu NGUYEN VAN & Marcus WAGNER, 2001. "Determinants of Environmental and Economic Performance of Firms: An Empirical Analysis of the European Paper Industry," Working Papers of BETA 2001-22, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    14. Bino Catasús & Maths Lundgren & Hans Rynnel, 1997. "Environmental managers' views on environmental work in a business context," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(4), pages 197-205, September.
    15. Yu-Shan Chen, 2008. "The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image – Green Core Competence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(3), pages 531-543, September.
    16. Sarmento, Manuela & Durão, Diamantino & Duarte, Manuela, 2007. "Evaluation of company effectiveness in implementing environmental strategies for a sustainable development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 920-926.
    17. Wen-Chih Yeh & Ming-Hsun Tseng & Chun-Chang Lee & Cheng Yu, 2020. "The Impact of Relationship Trust, Environmental Protection Awareness, and Regenerative Innovation on Environmental Performance: A Case Study of the Industrial Waste Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Runhui Lin & Yuan Gui & Zaiyang Xie & Lu Liu, 2019. "Green Governance and International Business Strategies of Emerging Economies’ Multinational Enterprises: A Multiple-Case Study of Chinese Firms in Pollution-Intensive Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-32, February.
    19. Runa Sarkar, 2008. "Public policy and corporate environmental behaviour: a broader view," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 281-297, September.
    20. Helena Forsman, 2013. "Environmental Innovations as a Source of Competitive Advantage or Vice Versa?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 306-320, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:10:y:2001:i:1:p:38-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.