IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v8y2018i3p697-704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competition versus cooperation – new approaches on the energy market considering aspects of competition law

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian Dumitru Tantau

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ana-Maria Iulia Santa

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Doctoral School of Business Administration, Bucharest, Romania; University of Vienna, Faculty of Law, Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

The common energy policy of the European Union is a current topic on the agenda of European institutions, reflected in package “Clean Energy for All Europeans”, proposed by the European Commission. Despite several harmonization attempts, the consensus needed for a common policy and for an Energy Union has not been reached yet. One possible element why we still do not have a common energy market is the lack of competition in the energy sector. In this context, the present research paper analyzes to what extent competition can be a key-factor in ensuring the modernization of the energy sector. Aspects of competition law which are relevant for building a common energy market are highlighted in the present research paper. Furthermore, the present article raises the question how important cooperation is, searching the proper balance between competition and cooperation. The present article uses an interdisciplinary research method, combining the analysis of primary and secondary European law, of legal instruments and provisions, considering the teleological method, with the assessment from a business and economics point of view. Case law and case studies from Member States of the European Union provide best practice models for the energy sector and present an international comparative perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Dumitru Tantau & Ana-Maria Iulia Santa, 2018. "Competition versus cooperation – new approaches on the energy market considering aspects of competition law," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 8(3), pages 697-704, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:697-704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An8v3/8.%20TANTAU,%20SANTA.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mastropietro, Paolo & Rodilla, Pablo & Batlle, Carlos, 2015. "National capacity mechanisms in the European internal energy market: Opening the doors to neighbours," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 38-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhagwat, Pradyumna C. & de Vries, Laurens J. & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2016. "Expert survey on capacity markets in the US: Lessons for the EU," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 11-17.
    2. Zimmermann, Florian & Bublitz, Andreas & Keles, Dogan & Fichtner, Wolf, 2019. "Cross-border effects of capacity remuneration mechanisms: The Swiss case," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 35, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    3. Liao, Qi & Tu, Renfu & Zhang, Wan & Wang, Bohong & Liang, Yongtu & Zhang, Haoran, 2023. "Auction design for capacity allocation in the petroleum pipeline under fair opening," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Bhagwat, Pradyumna C. & Richstein, Jörn C. & Chappin, Emile J.L. & Iychettira, Kaveri K. & De Vries, Laurens J., 2017. "Cross-border effects of capacity mechanisms in interconnected power systems," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 33-47.
    5. Gugler, Klaus & Haxhimusa, Adhurim, 2019. "Market integration and technology mix: Evidence from the German and French electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 30-46.
    6. Zappa, William & Junginger, Martin & van den Broek, Machteld, 2021. "Can liberalised electricity markets support decarbonised portfolios in line with the Paris Agreement? A case study of Central Western Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    7. Loisel, Rodica & Simon, Corentin, 2021. "Market strategies for large-scale energy storage: Vertical integration versus stand-alone player," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Vorushylo, I. & Keatley, P. & Hewitt, NJ, 2016. "Most promising flexible generators for the wind dominated market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 564-575.
    9. Brijs, Tom & De Jonghe, Cedric & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Belmans, Ronnie, 2017. "Interactions between the design of short-term electricity markets in the CWE region and power system flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 36-51.
    10. Giorgos Stamtsis & Haris Doukas, 2018. "Cooperation or Localization in European Capacity Markets? A Coalitional Game over Graph Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Bhagwat, Pradyumna C. & Iychettira, Kaveri K. & Richstein, Jörn C. & Chappin, Emile J.L. & Vries, Laurens J. De, 2017. "The effectiveness of capacity markets in the presence of a high portfolio share of renewable energy sources," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 48, pages 76-91.
    12. Juntunen, Jouni K. & Martiskainen, Mari, 2021. "Improving understanding of energy autonomy: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Kraan, Oscar & Kramer, Gert Jan & Nikolic, Igor & Chappin, Emile & Koning, Vinzenz, 2019. "Why fully liberalised electricity markets will fail to meet deep decarbonisation targets even with strong carbon pricing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 99-110.
    14. Klaus Gugler & Adhurim Haxhimusa, 2016. "Cross-Border Technology Differences and Trade Barriers: Evidence from German and French Electricity Markets," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp237, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    15. Bhagwat, Pradyumna C. & Richstein, Jörn C. & Chappin, Emile J.L. & Iychettira, Kaveri K. & Vries, Laurens J. De, 2017. "Cross-border effects of capacity mechanisms in interconnected power systems," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46, pages 33-47.
    16. Şanta Ana-Maria Iulia, 2018. "The energy union – a new step towards sustainability by promoting clean energy," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 896-906, May.
    17. Astier, Nicolas & Ovaere, Marten, 2022. "Reliability standards and generation adequacy assessments for interconnected electricity systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Şanta Ana-Maria Iulia, 2017. "The common energy market of the European Union – utopia or reality?," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 93-102, July.
    19. Gugler, Klaus & Haxhimusa, Adhurim, 2016. "Cross-Border Technology Differences and Trade Barriers: Evidence from German and French Electricity Markets," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 237, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    20. Sabolić, Dubravko, 2017. "On economic inefficiency of European Inter-TSO compensation mechanism," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 548-558.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    competition; cooperation; energy market; competition law; clean energy; Energy Union.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • K22 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Business and Securities Law
    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:8:y:2018:i:3:p:697-704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.