IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ndjtrf/207426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TRANSIMS Implementation for a Small Network and Comparison with Enhanced Four-Step Model

Author

Listed:
  • Jeihani, Mansoureh
  • Ardeshiri, Anam

Abstract

Travel demand forecasting is a major tool to assist decision makers in transportation planning. While the conventional four-step trip-based approach is the dominant method to perform travel demand analysis, behavioral advances have been made in the past decade. This paper proposes and applies an enhancemnt to the four-step travel demand analysis model called Sub-TAZ. Furthermore, as an initial step toward activity-based models, a TRANSIMS Track-1 approach is implemented utilizing a detailed network developed in Sub-TAZ approach. The conventional four-step, Sub-TAZ, and TRANSIMS models were estimated in a small case study for Fort Meade, Maryland, with zonal trip tables. The models were calibrated and validated for the base year (2005), and the forecasted results for the year (2010) were compared to actual ground counts of traffic volume and speed. The study evaluated the forecasting ability of TRANSIMS versus the conventional and enhanced fourstep models and provided critical observations concerning strategies for the further implementation of TRANSIMS.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeihani, Mansoureh & Ardeshiri, Anam, 2014. "TRANSIMS Implementation for a Small Network and Comparison with Enhanced Four-Step Model," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 53(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:207426
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207426/files/2014v53n1_02_TRANSIMS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony, 2009. "Sensitivity analysis of the combined travel demand model with applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 909-921, November.
    2. Zhou, Zhong & Chen, Anthony & Wong, S.C., 2009. "Alternative formulations of a combined trip generation, trip distribution, modal split, and trip assignment model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 129-138, October.
    3. Cheng, Liang-Chieh & Wang, Heng, 2013. "Modeling User Equilibrium in Microscopic Transportation Simulation," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 52(2).
    4. Festa, Demetrio C. & Condino, Daniela & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2006. "Experimental tour-based travel demand models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1472-1483, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Du, Muqing & Tan, Heqing & Chen, Anthony, 2021. "A faster path-based algorithm with Barzilai-Borwein step size for solving stochastic traffic equilibrium models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 982-999.
    2. Chen, Anthony & Choi, Keechoo, 2017. "Solving the combined modal split and traffic assignment problem with two types of transit impedance functionAuthor-Name: Ryu, Seungkyu," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 870-880.
    3. Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony & Xu, Xiangdong & Wong, S.C., 2013. "Sensitivity-based uncertainty analysis of a combined travel demand model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 225-244.
    4. Du, Muqing & Chen, Anthony, 2022. "Sensitivity analysis for transit equilibrium assignment and applications to uncertainty analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 175-202.
    5. Zheng, Yu & Zhang, Xiaoning & Liang, Zhe, 2020. "Multimodal subsidy design for network capacity flexibility optimization," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 16-35.
    6. Xu, Shu-Xian & Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun & Liu, Ronghui, 2018. "Mode choice and railway subsidy in a congested monocentric city with endogenous population distribution," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 413-433.
    7. Seungkyu Ryu & Anthony Chen & Xiangdong Xu & Keechoo Choi, 2014. "A Dual Approach for Solving the Combined Distribution and Assignment Problem with Link Capacity Constraints," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 245-270, June.
    8. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Yang, Hai & Lo, Hong K., 2015. "Modeling absolute and relative cost differences in stochastic user equilibrium problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 686-703.
    9. Ampol Karoonsoontawong & Dung-Ying Lin, 2015. "Combined Gravity Model Trip Distribution and Paired Combinatorial Logit Stochastic User Equilibrium Problem," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1011-1048, December.
    10. Cantarella, Giulio Erberto & Cartenì, Armando & de Luca, Stefano, 2015. "Stochastic equilibrium assignment with variable demand: Theoretical and implementation issues," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 330-347.
    11. Aguas, Oriana & Bachmann, Chris, 2022. "Assessing the effects of input uncertainties on the outputs of a freight demand model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    12. Gu, Yu & Chen, Anthony & Xu, Xiangdong, 2023. "Measurement and ranking of important link combinations in the analysis of transportation network vulnerability envelope buffers under multiple-link disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 118-144.
    13. Chootinan, Piya & Chen, Anthony, 2011. "Confidence interval estimation for path flow estimator," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1680-1698.
    14. Zhang, Jiayuan & Yalcin, Mehmet G. & Hales, Douglas N., 2021. "Elements of paradoxes in supply chain management literature: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    15. Liu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Zewen & Cheng, Qixiu & Yin, Ruyang & Wang, Meng, 2021. "Estimation of urban network capacity with second-best constraints for multimodal transport systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 276-294.
    16. Zhou, Bojian & Li, Xuhong & He, Jie, 2014. "Exploring trust region method for the solution of logit-based stochastic user equilibrium problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 46-57.
    17. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Jansuwan, Sarawut & Yang, Chao & Ryu, Seungkyu, 2018. "Transportation network redundancy: Complementary measures and computational methods," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 68-85.
    18. Zhaolin Cheng & Laijun Zhao & Huiyong Li, 2020. "A Transportation Network Paradox: Consideration of Travel Time and Health Damage due to Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, October.
    19. Yao, Jia & Chen, Anthony & Ryu, Seungkyu & Shi, Feng, 2014. "A general unconstrained optimization formulation for the combined distribution and assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 137-160.
    20. Long, Jiancheng & Gao, Ziyou & Zhang, Haozhi & Szeto, W.Y., 2010. "A turning restriction design problem in urban road networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 569-578, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:207426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.