IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/arerjl/31583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price And Quantity Effects Of Canada'S Dairy Adverstising Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Kinnucan, Henry W.
  • Belleza, Evelyn T.

Abstract

An equilibrium-displacement model is combined with econometric estimates of key model parameters to identify the impacts of Canada's dairy advertising programs on prices and quantity. Results suggest increased advertising of fluid milk enhances the farm value of milk but has minimal effect on government costs of the dairy price-support program. Owing to government intervention in the butter market, increased butter advertising has no effect on the farm value of milk, at least in the short run, but is highly effective at reducing government costs. Advertising is most effective, ceteris paribus, in markets where retail demand and wholesale supply for the specific dairy product are relatively price inelastic.

Suggested Citation

  • Kinnucan, Henry W. & Belleza, Evelyn T., 1995. "Price And Quantity Effects Of Canada'S Dairy Adverstising Programs," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:arerjl:31583
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31583/files/24020199.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.31583?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry W. Kinnucan & Olan D. Forker, 1987. "Asymmetry in Farm-Retail Price Transmission for Major Dairy Products," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 285-292.
    2. Ronald W. Ward & Bruce L. Dixon, 1989. "Effectiveness of Fluid Milk Advertising Since the Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(3), pages 730-740.
    3. Ellen W. Goddard & Alex K. Amuah, 1989. "The Demand for Canadian Fats and Oils: A Case Study of Advertising Effectiveness," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(3), pages 741-749.
    4. Nobuhiro Suzuki & Harry M. Kaiser & John E. Lenz & Olan D. Forker & Kohei Kobayashi, 1994. "Evaluating Generic Milk Promotion Effectiveness with an Imperfect Competition Model," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(2), pages 296-302.
    5. Meenakshi Venkateswaran & Henry W. Kinnucan, 1990. "Evaluating Fluid Milk Advertising in Ontario: The Importance of Functional Form," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 38(3), pages 471-488, November.
    6. Henry Kinnucan, 1987. "Effect of Canadian Advertising on MilK Demand: The Case of the Buffalo, New York Market," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 35(1), pages 181-196, March.
    7. Henry W. Kinnucan & Cynda R. Clary, 1995. "Brand versus generic advertising: A conceptual framework with an application to cheese," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(4), pages 355-369.
    8. E.W. Goddard & A. Tielu, 1988. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Fluid Milk Advertising in Ontario," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 36(2), pages 261-278, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiao, Hui & Kinnucan, Henry W. & Kaiser, Harry M., 1998. "Advertising, Structural Change, And U.S. Non-Alcoholic Beverage Demand," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20885, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Şişman, Muhammet Yunus, 2017. "An Economic Welfare Analysis Of Agricultural Subsidies And Inventory Holdings: An Application To The Hazelnut Industry1," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 5(4), October.
    3. H. W. Kinnucan, 1996. "A Note On Measuring Returns To Generic Advertising In Interrelated Markets," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 261-267, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Kevin Z. & Weerahewa, Jeevika, 1998. "Regulation, Market Power, And Advertising Effectiveness," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-9, October.
    2. Richards, Timothy J. & Patterson, Paul M., 1998. "New Varieties and the Returns to Commodity Promotion: Washington Fuji Apples," Working Papers 28541, Arizona State University, Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource Management.
    3. Capps, Oral & Seo, Seong-Cheon & Nichols, John P., 1997. "On the Estimation of Advertising Effects for Branded Products: An Application to Spaghetti Sauces," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 291-302, December.
    4. Williams, Gary W. & Capps, Jr., Oral, 2022. "The apparent conflict of Norwegian pelagic fisheries management and Norwegian seafood council export promotion," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(3), February.
    5. Seo, Seong-Cheon & Capps, Oral, Jr., 1997. "Testing For Store-Level Differences In Factors Affecting Item Movement Of Prego And Ragu Spaghetti Sauces Using Point-Of-Sale Data," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 28(3), pages 1-12, October.
    6. Sartorius von Bach, Helmke, 1992. "Economic Aspects Of Advertising In Agriculture: A Review," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 31(1), March.
    7. Othman, Jamal B. & McIntosh, Christopher S. & Houston, Jack B., 1994. "Price Competition And Informational Product Differentiation Effectiveness: The Case Of Edible Vegetable Oils In The U.S," 1994 Annual Meeting, August 7-10, San Diego, California 271417, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Williams, Gary W. & Capps Jr., Oral, 2020. "Generic promotion of Norwegian seafood exports," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(3), August.
    9. Lee, Jonq-Ying & Brown, Mark G., 1990. "Lag Structures in Commodity Advertising Research," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271019, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Kinnucan, Henry W. & Myrland, Oystein, 2002. "Relationship Between Partial and Total Responses to Advertising with Application to U.S. Meats," Research Bulletins 122634, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    11. Xiao, Hui & Kinnucan, Henry W. & Kaiser, Harry M., 1998. "Advertising, Structural Change, And U.S. Non-Alcoholic Beverage Demand," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20885, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Freebairn, John W. & Alston, Julian M., 2001. "Generic advertising without supply control: implications of funding mechanisms for advertising intensities in competitive industries," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(1), pages 1-29.
    13. Goddard, Ellen W. & Shank, Benjamin & Panter, Chris & Nilsson, Tomas K.H. & Cash, Sean B., 2007. "Canadian Chicken Industry: Consumer Preferences, Industry Structure and Producer Benefits from Investment in Research and Advertising," Project Report Series 52088, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    14. Briz, Julian & Ward, Ronald W. & de Felipe, Isabel, 1998. "Habit Formation And Demand System Estimates For Fluid Milk In Spain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 1(4), pages 1-17.
    15. Forker, Olan D. & Liu, Donald J., 1989. "Generic Dairy Promotion Economic Research: Past, Present, and Future," Staff Papers 197587, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    16. H. W. Kinnucan, 1996. "A Note On Measuring Returns To Generic Advertising In Interrelated Markets," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 261-267, January.
    17. Meilke, Karl D. & Sarker, Rakhal & Le Roy, Danny G., 1996. "Analyzing The Potential For Increased Trade In Dairy Products: A Canadian Perspective," Proceedings of the 2nd Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 1996: Understanding Canada\United States Dairy Disputes 16959, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    18. Hill, Debbie J. & Piggott, Roley R. & Griffith, Garry R., 1999. "Profitability Of Incremental Generic Promotion Expenditure By Australian Dairy Farmers," Working Papers 12913, University of New England, School of Economics.
    19. Sylvie Tchumtchoua & Ronald W. Cotterill, 2010. "Optimal Brand and Generic Advertising Policies in a Dynamic Differentiated Product Oligopoly," Food Marketing Policy Center Research Reports 126, University of Connecticut, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Charles J. Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy.
    20. Hill, D. J. & Piggott, R. R. & Griffith, G. R., 2001. "Profitability of incremental generic promotion of Australian dairy products," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 253-266, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:arerjl:31583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nareaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.