IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login

Top 25% Institutions and Economists in Washington (United States), as of February 2015

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Washington (United States), there are 86 authors affiliated with 17 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked. Authors with multiple affiliations are attributed to each according to the weights they have set to each in their profile, or by default according to a formula described here.

All institutions in this region.

Rankings for the United States and links to state rankings are available here.

Top 25% institutions in Washington (United States)

RankW.RankInstitutionScoreAuthorsAuthor shares
1[1]Department of Economics, University of Washington

Seattle, Washington (USA)

1.021917.89
2[2]Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Seattle, Washington (USA)

2.4599
3[3]School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University

Pullman, Washington (USA)

2.783131
---[---]Department of Finance and Business Economics, Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Seattle, Washington (USA)

3.8133
4[5]College of Business and Economics, Western Washington University

Bellingham, Washington (USA)

5.0677

Top 25% authors in Washington (United States)

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in EDIRC.
RankW.RankAuthorScore
1[1]Stephen J Turnovsky

Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

1.37
2[2]Charles R. Nelson

Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

1.7
3[3]Jonathan Mark Karpoff

Department of Finance and Business Economics, Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle

4.58
4[5]Fabio Ghironi

Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

5.11
5[6]Jacob Vigdor

Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle

6.31
6[7]Theo Stefan Eicher

Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

6.96
7[10]Paul H. Malatesta

Department of Finance and Business Economics, Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle

8.83
8[9]Jarrad Harford

Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle

8.85
9[8]Eric Zivot

Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

9.03
10[4]Chang-Jin Kim

Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

9.28
11[12]Steven Globerman

College of Business and Economics, Western Washington University, Bellingham

10
12[13]Jill J. McCluskey

School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman

10.75
13[11]Neil Bruce

Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

10.83
14[14]Ron Mittelhammer

School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman

12.79
15[15]C. Richard Shumway

School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman

13.59
16[16]Quan Wen

Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

16.13
17[17]Jacques Lawarree

Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

16.41
18[18]Anirban Basu

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle

16.57
19[19]Yu-chin Chen

Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

18.38
20[20]Stephan Siegel

Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle

19.77
21[21]Thomas L. Marsh

School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman

20.05

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.