Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Top 25% Institutions and Economists in Uruguay, as of March 2013

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Uruguay, there are 71 authors affiliated with 9 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked. Authors with multiple affiliations are attributed to each according to the weights they have set to each in their profile, or by default according to a formula described here.

All institutions in this region.

Top 25% institutions in Uruguay

RankW.RankInstitutionScoreAuthorsAuthor shares
1[2]Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economía, Universidad de Montevideo

Montevideo, Uruguay

1.5365.11
2[1]Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República

Montevideo, Uruguay

1.572117.16

Top 25% authors in Uruguay

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in EDIRC.
RankW.RankAuthorScore
1[2]Juan Dubra

Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economía, Universidad de Montevideo, Montevideo

1.36
2[3]Alvaro Javier Forteza

Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Montevideo

2.82
3[4]Ana Inés Balsa

Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economía, Universidad de Montevideo, Montevideo

3.82
4[1]Maximo Rossi

Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Montevideo

4.2
5[5]Fernando Borraz

Banco Central de Uruguay, Montevideo
Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Montevideo

4.9
6[6]Nestor Gandelman

Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad ORT Uruguay, Montevideo

5.56
7[8]Andrea Vigorito

Instituto de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y de la Administración, Universidad de la República, Montevideo

5.86
8[7]Marcel Vaillant

Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Montevideo

8.05
9[10]Adriana Cassoni

Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad ORT Uruguay, Montevideo

9.07
10[11]María Inés Terra

Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Montevideo

9.89
11[9]Patricia Triunfo

Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Montevideo

10.5
12[12]Gaston J. Labadie

Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad ORT Uruguay, Montevideo

12.25
13[15]Andrés Dean

Instituto de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y de la Administración, Universidad de la República, Montevideo

13
14[14]Ianina Rossi

Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Montevideo

13.73
15[17]Sebastián Torres Ledezma

Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y de la Administración, Universidad de la República, Montevideo
Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales, Universidad Católica, Montevideo

14.65
16[18]Gustavo Bittencourt

Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la República, Montevideo

17.2
17[23]Jorge Ponce

Banco Central de Uruguay, Montevideo

17.61

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.