Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case

Citations

Cited by:

1. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
   • Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Post-Print hal-00733521, HAL.
   • Mongin, Philippe, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," MPRA Paper 37752, University Library of Munich, Germany.
2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2013. "Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(4), pages 1067-1095, April.
   • Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2013. "Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case," Post-Print halshs-00978004, HAL.
   • Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2013. "Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 43283, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
   • Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2013. "Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978004, HAL.
3. Dietrich, Franz, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 463-493.
   • Dietrich, Franz, 2006. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," MPRA Paper 58870, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Sep 2014.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01249513, HAL.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01249513, HAL.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Post-Print halshs-01249513, HAL.
   • Franz Dietrich, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," PSE - Labex "OSE-Ouvrir la Science Economique" halshs-01249513, HAL.
   • Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2007. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
4. Dokow, Elad & Holzman, Ron, 2010. "Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 544-561, March.
5. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 441-466, March.
   • List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
   • Christian List & Ben Polak, 2010. "Introduction to Judgment Aggregation," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000000006, David K. Levine.
   • Christian List & Ben Polak, 2010. "Introduction to Judgment Aggregation," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1753, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
6. Bozbay, Irem, 2012. "Truth-Seeking Judgment Aggregation over Interconnected Issues," Working Papers 2012:31, Lund University, Department of Economics.
7. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 512-543, March.
   • Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27902, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
8. Bozbay, İrem & Dietrich, Franz & Peters, Hans, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 571-590.
   • Bozbay, I. & Dietrich, F.K. & Peters, H.J.M., 2011. "Judgement Aggregation in Search for the Truth," Research Memorandum 040, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
   • Irem Bozbay & Franz Dietrich & Hans Peters, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00978030, HAL.
   • Irem Bozbay & Franz Dietrich & Hans Peters, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Post-Print halshs-00978030, HAL.
   • Irem Bozbay & Franz Dietrich & Hans Peters, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978030, HAL.
9. Masaki Miyashita, 2021. "Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(2), pages 361-385, August.
10. Dietrich, Franz & Mongin, Philippe, 2010. "The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 562-582, March.
    • Dietrich, F.K. & Mongin, P., 2008. "The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    • Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2010. "The Premiss-Based Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Post-Print hal-00528387, HAL.
    • Dietrich, Franz & Mongin, Philippe, 2010. "The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27896, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
11. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
    • Mongin, Philippe & Dietrich, Franz, 2011. "An interpretive account of logical aggregation theory," HEC Research Papers Series 941, HEC Paris.
12. Baharad, Eyal & Neeman, Zvika & Rubinchik, Anna, 2020. "The rarity of consistent aggregators," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 146-149.
13. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2008. "A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 59-78, June.
    • Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2004. "A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation," Public Economics 0405003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
14. Dietrich, Franz, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 113-136.
    • Dietrich, Franz, 2013. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," MPRA Paper 51775, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
    • Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Post-Print hal-01252817, HAL.
    • Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-01252817, HAL.
15. Luigi Marengo & Simona Settepanella & Yan X. Zhang, 2021. "Towards a unified aggregation framework for preferences and judgments," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 21-44, April.
16. Philippe Mongin, 2011. "Judgment aggregation," Working Papers hal-00579346, HAL.
    • Philippe Mongin, 2011. "Judgment Aggregation," Working Papers hal-00625434, HAL.
    • Mongin, Philippe, 2011. "Judgment aggregation," HEC Research Papers Series 942, HEC Paris.
17. Michael Miller & Daniel Osherson, 2009. "Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(4), pages 575-601, May.
18. Nehring, Klaus & Puppe, Clemens, 2010. "Abstract Arrowian aggregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 467-494, March.
19. Hein Duijf & Frederik Putte, 2022. "The problem of no hands: responsibility voids in collective decisions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(4), pages 753-790, May.
20. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2008. "The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory," Research Memorandum 047, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
21. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré & Rubén Montes, 2023. "Optimal Decision Rules for the Discursive Dilemma," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 889-923, August.
22. Zoi Terzopoulou & Ulle Endriss, 2020. "Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(1), pages 25-49, June.
23. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 281-299, March.
    • Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2005. "The impossibility of unbiased judgement aggregation," Research Memorandum 049, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    • Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2007. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Research Memorandum 022, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
24. Elad Dokow & Ron Holzman, 2009. "Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(2), pages 221-241, February.
25. Dokow, Elad & Holzman, Ron, 2010. "Aggregation of binary evaluations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 495-511, March.
26. Pivato, Marcus & Nehring, Klaus, 2010. "The McGarvey problem in judgement aggregation," MPRA Paper 22600, University Library of Munich, Germany.