IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/oec/traaab/106-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Multilateralising Regionalism: How Preferential Are Services Commitments in Regional Trade Agreements?

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. United Nations ESCAP, 2011. "Identifying Trade and Investment Opportunities," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: United Nations ESCAP (ed.), Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2011: Post-crisis trade and investment opportunities, chapter 5, pages 55-86, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
  2. United Nations ESCAP, 2011. "Post-crisis Protectionism in the Region," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: United Nations ESCAP (ed.), Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2011: Post-crisis trade and investment opportunities, chapter 3, pages 33-43, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
  3. Bernard M. Hoekman & Aaditya Mattoo, 2013. "Liberalizing Trade in Services: Lessons from Regional and WTO Negotiations," RSCAS Working Papers 2013/34, European University Institute.
  4. Sébastien Miroudot & Ben Shepherd, 2014. "The Paradox of ‘Preferences’: Regional Trade Agreements and Trade Costs in Services," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(12), pages 1751-1772, December.
  5. Roy, Martin, 2011. "Services commitments in preferential trade agreements: An expanded dataset," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2011-18, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
  6. United Nations ESCAP, 2011. "Recent Trends in Foreign Direct Investment in the Region," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: United Nations ESCAP (ed.), Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2011: Post-crisis trade and investment opportunities, chapter 4, pages 45-53, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
  7. United Nations ESCAP, 2011. "Services Trade Instrumental for Trade Recovery," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: United Nations ESCAP (ed.), Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2011: Post-crisis trade and investment opportunities, chapter 2, pages 19-30, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
  8. Xing Yao & Yongzhong Zhang & Rizwana Yasmeen & Zhen Cai, 2021. "The impact of preferential trade agreements on bilateral trade: A structural gravity model analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, March.
  9. United Nations ESCAP (ed.), 2011. "Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2011: Post-crisis trade and investment opportunities," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), number aptir2596, july-dece.
  10. Jeongmeen Suh & Sihoon Nahm & Seung-Gyu Sim, 2016. "The Most Favored Nation Principle: Passive Constraint or Active Commitment?," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 32, pages 77-99.
  11. United Nations ESCAP, 2011. "Integrating Small and Medium-sized Enterprises into the Regional and Global Markets," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: United Nations ESCAP (ed.), Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2011: Post-crisis trade and investment opportunities, chapter 7, pages 103-110, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
  12. Bernard Hoekman, 2017. "Trade in services: Opening markets to create opportunities," WIDER Working Paper Series 031, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
  13. United Nations ESCAP, 2011. "Facilitating Intraregional Trade," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: United Nations ESCAP (ed.), Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2011: Post-crisis trade and investment opportunities, chapter 6, pages 89-100, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
  14. Adlung, Rudolf & Miroudot, Sébastien, 2012. "Poison in the wine? Tracing GATS-minus commitments in regional trade agreements," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2012-04, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
  15. Tanu M. Goyal, 2021. "Technology Uncertainty and Incompleteness in Trade Agreements: Reflections from the Design of India’s Bilateral Agreements Covering Services," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 56(3), pages 322-340, August.
  16. Sébastien Miroudot & Ben Shepherd, 2015. "Regional Trade Agreements and Trade Costs in Services," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/85, European University Institute.
  17. MILE 02, Anirudh Shingal & Sauvé, Pierre, 2011. "Reflections on the Preferential Liberalization of Services Trade," Papers 146, World Trade Institute.
  18. Bernard Hoekman, 2017. "Trade in services: Opening markets to create opportunities," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-31, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
  19. Matteo Fiorini & Bernard Hoekman, 2017. "Economic Governance, Regulation and Services Trade Liberalization," RSCAS Working Papers 2017/27, European University Institute.
  20. Erik der Marel & Sébastien Miroudot, 2014. "The economics and political economy of going beyond the GATS," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 205-239, June.
  21. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), 2011. "Trade Performance Indicators," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2011: Post-crisis trade and investment opportunities, pages 131-179, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
  22. Alexander Daniltsev & Olga Biryukova, 2015. "Beyond the GATS: Implicit Engines in Services RTAs," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 62(3), pages 321-337, June.
  23. United Nations ESCAP, 2011. "Using Trade Agreements to Trade Easier and Cheaper, with More Benefits for All," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: United Nations ESCAP (ed.), Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2011: Post-crisis trade and investment opportunities, chapter 8, pages 113-129, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
  24. Nianli Zhou & John Whalley, 2014. "How Do the "GATS-Plus" and "GATS-Minus" Characteristics of Regional Service Agreements Affect Trade in Services?," NBER Working Papers 20551, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  25. Woori Lee, 2017. "Services liberalization and GVC participation: New evidence for heterogeneous effects by income level and provisions," CTEI Working Papers series 08-2017, Centre for Trade and Economic Integration, The Graduate Institute.
  26. Lili Yan Ing & Ralf Peters & Olivier Cadot, 2019. "Regional Integration and NTM in ASEAN," Books, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), number 2019-regional_integration, March.
  27. United Nations ESCAP, 2011. "Merchandise Trade Continues to Rebound," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: United Nations ESCAP (ed.), Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2011: Post-crisis trade and investment opportunities, chapter 1, pages 1-16, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
  28. Marchetti, Juan & Roy, Martin & Zoratto, Laura, 2012. "Is there reciprocity in preferential trade agreements on services?," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2012-16, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
  29. Bernard M. Hoekman & Petros C. Mavroidis, 2013. "WTO 'à la carte' or WTO 'menu du jour'? Assessing the case for Plurilateral Agreements," RSCAS Working Papers 2013/58, European University Institute.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.