Continuous subjective expected utility with non-additive probabilities

Citations

Cited by:

1. André Lapied & Pascal Toquebeuf, 2011. "Dynamically consistent CEU preferences," Working Papers halshs-00856193, HAL.
   • Andre Lapied & Pascal Toquebeuf, 2012. "Dynamically consistent CEU preferences," TEPP Working Paper 2012-10, TEPP.
2. Krzysztof Kontek, 2009. "Lottery valuation using the aspiration / relative utility function," Working Papers 39, Department of Applied Econometrics, Warsaw School of Economics.
3. Adam Dominiak & Jean-Philippe Lefort, 2011. "Unambiguous events and dynamic Choquet preferences," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 46(3), pages 401-425, April.
   • Dominiak, Adam & Lefort, Jean-Philippe, 2009. "Unambiguous Events and Dynamic Choquet Preferences," Working Papers 0489, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
4. Cesaltina Pacheco Pires, 2002. "A Rule For Updating Ambiguous Beliefs," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 137-152, September.
5. Alon, Shiri & Schmeidler, David, 2014. "Purely subjective Maxmin Expected Utility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 382-412.
6. Andreas Lehnert & Wayne Passmore, 1999. "Pricing systemic crises: monetary and fiscal policy when savers are uncertain," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 1999-33, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
7. Gilboa, Itzhak & Minardi, Stefania & Samuelson, Larry, 2020. "Theories and cases in decisions under uncertainty," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 22-40.
8. Alain Chateauneuf & Michèle Cohen, 2008. "Cardinal extensions of EU model based on the Choquet integral," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00348822, HAL.
   • Alain Chateauneuf & Michèle Cohen, 2009. "Cardinal Extensions of the EU Model Based on the Choquet Integral," Post-Print hal-00671302, HAL.
   • Alain Chateauneuf & Michèle Cohen, 2008. "Cardinal extensions of EU model based on the Choquet integral," Post-Print halshs-00348822, HAL.
   • Alain Chateauneuf & Michèle Cohen, 2009. "Cardinal Extensions of the EU Model Based on the Choquet Integral," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00671302, HAL.
   • Alain Chateauneuf & Michèle Cohen, 2009. "Cardinal Extensions of the EU Model Based on the Choquet Integral," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-00671302, HAL.
   • Alain Chateauneuf & Michèle Cohen, 2008. "Cardinal extensions of EU model based on the Choquet integral," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne v08087, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
9. Matthew Rabin, 1998. "Psychology and Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 11-46, March.
   • Rabin, Matthew, 1997. "Psychology and Economics," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt8jd5z5j2, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
   • Matthew Rabin., 1997. "Psychology and Economics," Economics Working Papers 97-251, University of California at Berkeley.
10. Ebbe Groes & Hans Jacobsen & Birgitte Sloth & Torben Tranæs, 1999. "Testing the Intransitivity Explanation of the Allais Paradox," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 229-245, December.
    • Ebbe Groes & Hans Jørgen Jacobsen & Birgitte Sloth & Torben Tranæs, 1997. "Testing the Intransitivity Explanation of the Allais Paradox," CIE Discussion Papers 1998-18, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Industrial Economics, revised Oct 1998.
11. Ehud Lehrer, 2009. "A new integral for capacities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 39(1), pages 157-176, April.
    • Ehud Lehrer, 2005. "A new integral for capacities," Game Theory and Information 0504004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
12. Pivato, Marcus & Vergopoulos, Vassili, 2018. "Subjective expected utility with topological constraints," MPRA Paper 85749, University Library of Munich, Germany.
13. Jean-Laurent Viviani, 1996. "Incertitude, arbitrage et taux de change," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 123(2), pages 223-228.
14. Hubert, Franz & Schäfer, Dorothea, 2002. "Coordination Failure with Multiple-Source Lending: The Cost of Protection against a Powerful Lender," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 158(2), pages 256-275.
    • Franz Hubert & Dorothea Schäfer, 2002. "Coordination Failure with Multiple-Source Lending, the Cost of Protection Against a Powerful Lender," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 158(2), pages 256-275, June.
15. Segal, Uzi & Sobel, Joel, 2002. "Min, Max, and Sum," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 126-150, September.
    • Segal, Uzi & Sobel, Joel, 2000. "Min, Max, and Sum," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt8ms3g4t1, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    • Uzi Segal & Joel Sobel, 2001. "Min, Max, and Sum," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 512, Boston College Department of Economics.
16. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Keiding, Hans, 1996. "Representation of preferences on fuzzy measures by a fuzzy integral," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-17, February.
17. Bouyssou, Denis & Pirlot, Marc, 2004. "A note on Wakker's Cardinal Coordinate Independence," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 11-22, July.
    • Denis Bouyssou & Marc Pirlot, 2004. "A note on Wakker's Cardinal Coordinate Independence," Post-Print hal-00004075, HAL.
18. Camerer, Colin & Weber, Martin, 1992. "Recent Developments in Modeling Preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 325-370, October.
    • Camerer, Colin F. & Weber, Martin, 1991. "Recent developments in modelling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguitiy," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 275, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
19. Lapied, André & Toquebeuf, Pascal, 2012. "Dynamically consistent CEU preferences on f-convex events," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 252-256.
20. Dominiak, Adam, 2013. "Iterated Choquet expectations: A possibility result," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 155-159.
21. Gul, Faruk & Pesendorfer, Wolfgang, 2020. "Calibrated uncertainty," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
22. Geir B. Asheim & Stéphane Zuber, 2017. "Rank-discounting as a resolution to a dilemma in population ethics," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17041, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    • Geir Asheim & Stéphane Zuber, 2022. "Rank-discounting as a resolution to a dilemma in population ethics," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-03760526, HAL.
    • Geir B Asheim & Stéphane Zuber, 2018. "Rank-discounting as a resolution to a dilemma in population ethics," Post-Print halshs-01599532, HAL.
    • Asheim, Geir B. & Zuber, Stéphane, 2018. "Rank-discounting as a resolution to a dilemma in population ethics," Memorandum 7/2018, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    • Geir B Asheim & Stéphane Zuber, 2018. "Rank-discounting as a resolution to a dilemma in population ethics," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01599532, HAL.
    • Geir Asheim & Stéphane Zuber, 2022. "Rank-discounting as a resolution to a dilemma in population ethics," Post-Print halshs-03760526, HAL.
    • Geir B. Asheim & Stéphane Zuber, 2017. "Rank-discounting as a resolution to a dilemma in population ethics," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17041r, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Nov 2018.
    • Geir Asheim & Stéphane Zuber, 2022. "Rank-discounting as a resolution to a dilemma in population ethics," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03760526, HAL.
23. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2101 is not listed on IDEAS
24. Modica, Salvatore, 1991. "Neo-Bayesian Decision Making with Subjective Models," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275517, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
25. Pivato, Marcus & Vergopoulos, Vassili, 2017. "Subjective expected utility representations for Savage preferences on topological spaces," MPRA Paper 77359, University Library of Munich, Germany.
26. Andrea Capotorti & Giulianella Coletti & Barbara Vantaggi, 2008. "Preferences Representable by a Lower Expectation: Some Characterizations," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 119-146, March.
27. Mohammed Abdellaoui & Han Bleichrodt & Enrico Diecidue & Horst Zank, 2022. "Introduction to the Special Issue in Honor of Peter Wakker," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 433-444, April.
28. Dominiak, Adam & Lefort, Jean-Philippe, 2015. "“Agreeing to disagree” type results under ambiguity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 119-129.
29. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7323 is not listed on IDEAS
30. Ramon Casadesus-Masanell & Peter Klibanoff & Emre Ozdenoren, 1998. "Maximum Expected Utility over Savage Acts with a Set of Priors," Discussion Papers 1218, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
31. Pascal Toquebeuf, 2016. "Choquet expected utility with affine capacities," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 177-187, August.
    • Pascal Toquebeuf, 2016. "Choquet expected utility with affine capacities," Post-Print halshs-01250975, HAL.
32. Stefan Trautmann & Peter P. Wakker, 2018. "Making the Anscombe-Aumann approach to ambiguity suitable for descriptive applications," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 83-116, February.
33. Craig Webb, 2015. "Piecewise additivity for non-expected utility," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 60(2), pages 371-392, October.
    • Craig S. Webb, 2015. "Piecewise Additivity for Nonexpected Utility," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1503, Economics, The University of Manchester.
34. Bossert, Walter, 1997. "Uncertainty aversion in nonprobabilistic decision models," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 191-203, October.
    • Bossert, W., 1996. "Uncertainty Aversion in Nonprobabilistic Decision Models," Working Papers 9609, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics.
35. André Lapied & Pascal Tocquebeuf, 2007. "Consistent Dynamice Choice And Non-Expected Utility Preferences," Working Papers halshs-00353880, HAL.
    • André Lapied & Pascal Toquebeuf, 2009. "Consistent dynamic choice and non-expected utility preferences," Working Papers hal-00416214, HAL.
36. Casadesus-Masanell, Ramon & Klibanoff, Peter & Ozdenoren, Emre, 2000. "Maxmin Expected Utility over Savage Acts with a Set of Priors," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 35-65, May.
37. Yaarit Even & Ehud Lehrer, 2014. "Decomposition-integral: unifying Choquet and the concave integrals," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 56(1), pages 33-58, May.
38. Ghirardato, Paolo & Le Breton, Michel, 2000. "Choquet Rationality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 277-285, February.
    • GHIRARDATO, Paolo & LE BRETON, Michel, 1999. "Choquet rationality," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1999012, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    • GHIRARDATO, Paolo & LE BRETON, Michel, 2000. "Choquet rationality," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1447, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
39. Cho, Wonki Jo, 2022. "How to add apples and oranges: Aggregating performances of different nature," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 222-244.
40. Mingli Zheng, 2014. "Lobbying for wealth redistribution by changing the social planner’s preferences," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 26(1), pages 79-92, January.
41. André Lapied & Robert Kast, 2005. "Updating Choquet valuation and discounting information arrivals," Working Papers 05-09, LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier, revised Jan 2005.
    • André Lapied & Robert Kast, 2009. "Updating Choquet valuation and discounting information arrivals," Working Papers halshs-00410532, HAL.
42. Dominiak, Adam & Lee, Min Suk, 2017. "Coherent Dempster–Shafer equilibrium and ambiguous signals," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 42-54.
43. Kontek, Krzysztof, 2009. "On Mental Transformations," MPRA Paper 16516, University Library of Munich, Germany.
44. Adam Dominiak & Jean-Philippe Lefort, 2021. "Ambiguity and Probabilistic Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4310-4326, July.