IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/penwps/316435.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

From twin transition to twice the burden? Digitalisation, energy demand, and economic growth

Author

Listed:
  • Hambye-Verbrugghen, Jérôme
  • Bianchini, Stefano
  • Brockway, Paul Edward
  • Aramendia, Emmanuel
  • Heun, Matthew Kuperus
  • Marshall, Zeke

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluate the potential of digitalisation to drive structural transformations toward a sustainable economy. We apply an index decomposition analysis (IDA) to understand the factors influencing energy demand in a panel of 31 high-income countries from 1971 to 2019. The IDA framework includes four factors related to the scale and sectoral composition of the economy and technical improvements, accounting for the quality of energy flows and actual work potential through useful exergy measures. We first apply the model at the sector level across 16 productive industries to explore cross-sector heterogeneity in the structure of energy demand. Industries are then classified by digital intensity categories, allowing us to compare results across different levels of digitalisation. We find that value added growth is the primary driver of energy use. While digitalisation alone does not fully explain trends in energy demand, it is associated with substantial value added growth in high digital intensity sectors and amplifies the use of energy. This suggests that digitalisation, if unchecked, may in fact exacerbate economic-ecological tensions rather than alleviate them. We discuss the implications of these findings in the context of recent policy actions aimed at accelerating the green and digital- "twin"-transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Hambye-Verbrugghen, Jérôme & Bianchini, Stefano & Brockway, Paul Edward & Aramendia, Emmanuel & Heun, Matthew Kuperus & Marshall, Zeke, 2025. "From twin transition to twice the burden? Digitalisation, energy demand, and economic growth," Working Paper Series 06/2025, Post-Growth Economics Network (PEN).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:penwps:316435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/316435/1/1924014068.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Proskuryakova, L. & Kovalev, A., 2015. "Measuring energy efficiency: Is energy intensity a good evidence base?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 450-459.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matteo Piccioni & Fabrizio Martini & Chiara Martini & Claudia Toro, 2024. "Evaluation of Energy Performance Indicators and Energy Saving Opportunities for the Italian Rubber Manufacturing Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Da Gao & Chang Liu & Xinyan Wei & Yang Liu, 2023. "Can River Chief System Policy Improve Enterprises’ Energy Efficiency? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. van Megen, Bram & Bürer, Meinrad & Patel, Martin K., 2019. "Comparing electricity consumption trends: A multilevel index decomposition analysis of the Genevan and Swiss economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-25.
    4. Shuangjie Li & Hongyu Diao & Liming Wang & Chunqi Li, 2021. "Energy Efficiency Measurement: A VO TFEE Approach and Its Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Jialing Zou & Zhipeng Tang & Shuang Wu, 2019. "Divergent Leading Factors in Energy-Related CO 2 Emissions Change among Subregions of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Area from 2006 to 2016: An Extended LMDI Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Perroni, Marcos G. & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Vieira da Silva, Wesley & Tortato, Ubiratã, 2018. "Measuring energy performance: A process based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 540-553.
    7. Ahmad, Shakeel & Jia, Haifeng & Chen, Zhengxia & Li, Qian & Xu, Changqing, 2020. "Water-energy nexus and energy efficiency: A systematic analysis of urban water systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Nie, Pu-Yan & Wang, Chan & Yang, Yon-Cong, 2017. "Comparison of energy efficiency subsidies under market power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 144-149.
    9. Chen, Lifeng & Wang, Kaifeng, 2022. "The spatial spillover effect of low-carbon city pilot scheme on green efficiency in China's cities: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    10. Adom, Philip Kofi & Adams, Samuel, 2018. "Energy savings in Nigeria. Is there a way of escape from energy inefficiency?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2421-2430.
    11. Shu, Tianheng & Liao, Xia & Yang, Shuo & Yu, Taofang, 2024. "Towards sustainability: Evaluating energy efficiency with a super-efficiency SBM-DEA model across 168 economies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PA).
    12. Feng, Yidai & Yuan, Huaxi & Liu, Yaobin, 2023. "The energy-saving effect in the new transformation of urbanization," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 41-59.
    13. Krutwig Michael C. & Tanțău Adrian, 2018. "Obligatory versus voluntary energy audits: are there differences in quality?," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 522-532, May.
    14. Wu, Kaiyao & Shi, Jiyuan & Yang, Tinggan, 2017. "Has energy efficiency performance improved in China?—non-energy sectors evidence from sequenced hybrid energy use tables," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 169-181.
    15. Lv, Yulan & Chen, Wei & Cheng, Jianquan, 2020. "Effects of urbanization on energy efficiency in China: New evidence from short run and long run efficiency models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    16. Ge, Tao & Ding, Ziqi & Lu, Xiaoya & Yang, Keling, 2023. "Spillover effect of energy intensity targets on renewable energy consumption in China: A spatial econometric approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    17. Lin, Yuancheng & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng & Ni, Weidou, 2023. "The carbon reduction potential by improving technical efficiency from energy sources to final services in China: An extended Kaya identity analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    18. Panait, Mirela & Apostu, Simona Andreea & Vasile, Valentina & Vasile, Razvan, 2022. "Is energy efficiency a robust driver for the new normal development model? A Granger causality analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Rishan Adha & Cheng‐Yih Hong & Su‐Fen Yang & Syamsiyatul Muzayyanah, 2024. "Re‐Unveiling the energy efficiency impact: Paving the way for sustainable growth in ASEAN countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 5812-5824, October.
    20. Gen Li & Jingwen Wang & Fan Liu & Tao Wang & Ying Zhou & Airui Tian, 2023. "Regional Differences and Convergence of Technical Efficiency in China’s Marine Economy under Carbon Emission Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Structural Change; Energy; Energy Efficiency; Digitalisation; Technological Change;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q43 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy and the Macroeconomy
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation
    • L16 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Industrial Organization and Macroeconomics; Macroeconomic Industrial Structure
    • O44 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Environment and Growth
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:penwps:316435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.postgrowtheconomics.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.