IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/opodis/20212.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

South Korea, China and the Road and Belt Initiative: Economic and political factors

Author

Listed:
  • Barannikova, Anastasia

Abstract

The present article addresses the problems of economic cooperation between China and ROK from the point of implementing their Eurasian integration initiatives - the One Belt, One Road, Eurasia Initiative and New Northern Policy. The initiatives of both countries, which at first glance are aimed at developing economies of the participants, also pursue distinct political goals. Accordingly, the most serious problems arising on the way of their implementation are of a political nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Barannikova, Anastasia, 2021. "South Korea, China and the Road and Belt Initiative: Economic and political factors," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-2, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:opodis:20212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/233897/1/1757278273.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul J. J. Welfens, 2019. "The Global Trump," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-21784-6, December.
    2. Kolev, Stefan, 2010. "Der bulgarische Weg seit 1989: Wachstum ohne Ordnung?," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2010-12, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schneegans, Tim, 2019. "Escaping the comfort zone: A three-level perspective on filtering effects and counter-measures," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2019-05, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    2. Eve Bratman & Ted Auch & Bryan Stinchfield, 2022. "The Fracking Frontier in the United States: A Case Study of Foreign Investment, Civil Liberties and Land Ethics in the Shale Industry," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(3), pages 469-494, May.
    3. Kaan Celebi & Paul J.J. Welfens, 2021. "The Stock Market, Labor-Income Risk and Unemployment in the US: Empirical Findings and Policy Implications," EIIW Discussion paper disbei291, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    4. Platje, Joost, 2011. "Institutional change for creating capacity and capability for sustainable development: A club good perspective," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2011-06, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    5. Lukin, Artyom, 2021. "Road and Belt, Iron Silk Road and Russian-Chinese geopolitical cooperation and competition," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-3, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    6. Effelsberg, Martin, 2011. "Measuring absorptive capacity of national innovation systems," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2011-04, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    7. Sean Kenji Starrs & Julian Germann, 2021. "Responding to the China Challenge in Techno‐nationalism: Divergence between Germany and the United States," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(5), pages 1122-1146, September.
    8. Seliger, Bernhard, 2020. "North Korea's political economy: Hybrid economic institutions and the contributions of German order policy (Ordnungspolitik)," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2020-2, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    9. Seidt, Hans-Ulrich, 2021. "Korea and Germany as endpoints of the new silk road: Opportunities for cooperation," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-4, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    10. Ukrainski, Kadri & Kanep, Hanna & Kirs, Margit & Karo, Erkki, 2019. "International R&D networks of firms: A country-level analysis of the EU framework programmes," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2019-01, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    11. Simone Arnaldi & Alessandro Lombardo & Angela Tessarolo, 2021. "A preliminary study of science diplomacy networks in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Todd Landman & Bernard W. Silverman, 2019. "Globalization and Modern Slavery," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 275-290.
    13. Timo Mandler & Fabian Bartsch & C. Min Han, 2021. "Brand credibility and marketplace globalization: The role of perceived brand globalness and localness," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(8), pages 1559-1590, October.
    14. Ferdi De Ville & Gabriel Siles-Brügge, 2019. "The Impact of Brexit on EU Trade Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 7-18.
    15. Sepp, Jüri & Varblane, Uku, 2014. "The decomposition of productivity gap between Estonia and Korea," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2014-03, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    16. Lucas Bretschger & Elise Grieg & Paul J. J. Welfens & Tian Xiong, 2020. "COVID-19 infections and fatalities developments: empirical evidence for OECD countries and newly industrialized economies," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 801-847, October.
    17. Mingchun Cao & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, August.
    18. Guliyev, Farid, 2020. "Trump’s “America first” energy policy, contingency and the reconfiguration of the global energy order," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    19. Heß, Alexander & Hindermann, Christoph Michael, 2021. "Trade effects on happiness in Asia," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-9, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    20. Go, Joohyun, 2021. "The prospects of cultural exchange to foster the economic relationship between the EU and Korea," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-7, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Belt and Road Initiative; OBOR; Eurasia Initiative; Eurasian integration; China; ROK;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:opodis:20212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ordnungspolitisches-portal.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.