IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/opodis/201202.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

National innovation systems: Can they be copied?

Author

Listed:
  • Varblane, Urmas

Abstract

This chapter discusses the application of the national system approach in the catching up economies. It criticizes the assumption that there exists an optimal one-sizefits-all national innovation system model. The example is the Estonia-Finland case, in which Finland's national innovation system is being applied to Estonia. We argue that innovation is path dependent and that factors such as distance from the current technological frontier (latecomer or frontrunner) and different national knowledge bases must be considered when developing a national innovation system for a specific country. The aim of the chapter is thus two-fold: 1) we are interested in how the concept of innovation is presented and reproduced within the national context and 2) exploring the adverse effects of (re)producing National Innovations Systems in an uncritical and unreflexive manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Varblane, Urmas, 2012. "National innovation systems: Can they be copied?," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2012-02, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:opodis:201202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/67496/1/732543363.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erkki Karo & Rainer Kattel, 2010. "The Copying Paradox: Why Converging Policies but Diverging Capacities in Eastern European Innovation Systems?," Institutions and Economies (formerly known as International Journal of Institutions and Economies), Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, vol. 2(2), pages 167-206, October.
    2. Erkki Karo & Rainer Kattel, 2009. "The Copying Paradox: Why Converging Policies but Diverging Capacities for Development in Eastern European Innovation Systems?," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 24, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    3. Rainer Kattel & Erkki Karo, 2010. "Is 'Open Innovation' Re-Inventing Innovation Policy for Catching-up Economies?," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 30, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    4. Kolev, Stefan, 2010. "Der bulgarische Weg seit 1989: Wachstum ohne Ordnung?," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2010-12, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kwieciński Leszek, 2014. "Proinnovative Policy and the National Innovation System a case study from Poland," Central and Eastern European Review, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 11-40, December.
    2. Proksch, Dorian & Haberstroh, Marcus Max & Pinkwart, Andreas, 2017. "Increasing the national innovative capacity: Identifying the pathways to success using a comparative method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 256-270.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rainer Kattel & Leonardo Burlamaqui, 2016. "Development Theory: Convercence, Catch-Up Or Leapfrogging And Finance ?," Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 073, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    2. Schneegans, Tim, 2019. "Escaping the comfort zone: A three-level perspective on filtering effects and counter-measures," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2019-05, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    3. Rõigas, Kärt, 2011. "Linkage between productivity and innovation in different service sectors," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2011-02, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    4. Sepp, Jüri & Kaldaru, Helje & Joamets, Jürgen, 2014. "The characteristics and position of the economic structures of Estonia and Korea among the OECD countries," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2014-04, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    5. A. Lasagni, 2011. "European SMEs, external relationships and innovation: some empirical evidence," Economics Department Working Papers 2011-EP04, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    6. Kolev, Stefan, 2017. "Individualism and demographic change," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2017-04, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    7. Platje, Joost, 2011. "Institutional change for creating capacity and capability for sustainable development: A club good perspective," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2011-06, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    8. Lukin, Artyom, 2021. "Road and Belt, Iron Silk Road and Russian-Chinese geopolitical cooperation and competition," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-3, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    9. Effelsberg, Martin, 2011. "Measuring absorptive capacity of national innovation systems," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2011-04, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    10. Seliger, Bernhard, 2020. "North Korea's political economy: Hybrid economic institutions and the contributions of German order policy (Ordnungspolitik)," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2020-2, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    11. Seidt, Hans-Ulrich, 2021. "Korea and Germany as endpoints of the new silk road: Opportunities for cooperation," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-4, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    12. Park, Sung-Jo, 2013. "Developmental state in Korea (60-70ties) revisited: Institution-building for the making of 'coordinated market'," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2013-02, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    13. Ukrainski, Kadri & Kanep, Hanna & Kirs, Margit & Karo, Erkki, 2019. "International R&D networks of firms: A country-level analysis of the EU framework programmes," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2019-01, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    14. Sepp, Jüri & Varblane, Uku, 2014. "The decomposition of productivity gap between Estonia and Korea," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2014-03, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    15. Wrobel, Ralph, 2021. "Kim Jong-un's Byungjin Policy: Support or obstacle for economic convergence on the Korean peninsula?," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-5, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    16. Yalamova, Rossitsa, 2019. "Blockchain angels or demons of a free international order," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2019-02, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    17. Kim, Duyeon, 2021. "Belt and road in the new geo-political competition: China, the United States, Europe and Korea," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-8, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    18. Margit Kirs & Veiko Lember & Erkki Karo, 2021. "Technology transfer in economic periphery: Emerging patterns and policy challenges," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(6), pages 677-706, November.
    19. Jaanus Müür, 2022. "Intermediating Smart Specialisation and Entrepreneurial Discovery: The Cases of Estonia and Helsinki-Uusimaa," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 541-573, March.
    20. Panda, Jagannath P., 2021. "China's BRI diplomacy: What it means to India and India's rise," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2021-12, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    National Innovation System; Copy; Estonia;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:opodis:201202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ordnungspolitisches-portal.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.