IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/oefsep/412022.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Team Europe: Machtverschiebung oder bloßes Marketing in der EU-Entwicklungszusammenarbeit?

Author

Listed:
  • Schlögl, Lukas

Abstract

Team Europe ist eine politische Initiative, die Aktivitäten der Europäischen Kommission und der EU-Mitgliedsstaaten unter gemeinsame Steuerung und ein gemeinsames Label bringt. Ziel ist es, nach Außen hin als geeinte Akteursgruppe sichtbarer und strategisch koordinierter aufzutreten. Die vorliegende Policy Note fasst den Stand der Initiative, deren Ziele und Ansprüche zusammen, ordnet Team Europe politisch ein und diskutiert Kritikpunkte daran. Die Policy Note gibt einen Ausblick und skizziert Handlungsmöglichkeiten für Österreichs Position zu Team Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Schlögl, Lukas, 2022. "Team Europe: Machtverschiebung oder bloßes Marketing in der EU-Entwicklungszusammenarbeit?," Policy Notes 41/2022, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:oefsep:412022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/267731/1/182811927X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bourguignon, François & Platteau, Jean-Philippe, 2015. "The Hard Challenge of Aid Coordination," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 86-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    2. Marson, Marta & Savin, Ivan, 2022. "Complementary or adverse? Comparing development results of official funding from China and traditional donors in Africa," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 189-206.
    3. Iliana Olivié & Aitor Pérez, 2016. "Why don’t donor countries coordinate their aid? A case study of European donors in Morocco," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 16(1), pages 52-64, January.
    4. Nathalie Ferrière, 2022. "To Give or Not to Give? How Do Other Donors React to European Food Aid Allocation?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 147-171, February.
    5. Tony Addison & Finn Tarp, 2015. "Lessons for Japanese Foreign Aid from Research on Aid's Impact," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2015-058, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Bedassa Tadesse & Elias Shukralla & Bichaka Fayissa, 2017. "Are bilateral and multilateral aid-for-trade complementary?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(10), pages 2125-2152, October.
    7. Bourguignon, François & Platteau, Jean-Philippe, 2017. "Does Aid Availability Affect Effectiveness in Reducing Poverty? A Review Article," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 6-16.
    8. Muhammad Mustafizur Rahaman & Niaz Ahmed Khan, 2017. "Making international aid effective: An agenda for aligning aid to social business," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 96-117, October.
    9. Maurizio Carbone, 2017. "Make Europe happen on the ground? Enabling and constraining factors for European Union aid coordination in Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(4), pages 531-548, July.
    10. Nathalie Ferrière, 2016. "To give or not to give? How do donors react to European food aid allocation?," Working Papers halshs-01405130, HAL.
    11. Gehring, Kai & Michaelowa, Katharina & Dreher, Axel & Spörri, Franziska, 2017. "Aid Fragmentation and Effectiveness: What Do We Really Know?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 320-334.
    12. Molenaers, Nadia & Dellepiane, Sebastian & Faust, Jorg, 2015. "Political Conditionality and Foreign Aid," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 2-12.
    13. Md. Raquibuzzaman Khan & Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Nazia Tabassum & Niaz Ahmed Khan & Andrew M. McKenzie, 2023. "Supply chain challenges and recommendations for international development agriculture projects: an application of the FGD-fuzzy Delphi approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Mohamed M. Sraieb, 2022. "The dynamics of US foreign aid decisions," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 1859-1886, October.
    15. Nathalie Ferrière & Camille Noûs, 2022. "Filling the "decency gap"? Donors' reaction to the US policy on international family planning aid," Working Papers hal-03740404, HAL.
    16. Johnny Flentø & Leonardo Santos Simao, 2020. "Donor relations and sovereignty," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2020-135, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    17. Kaplan, Lennart, 2020. "Systemic challenges and opportunities of Franco-German development cooperation," IDOS Discussion Papers 10/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    18. Renato Passaro & Ivana Quinto & Giuseppe Scandurra & Antonio Thomas, 2020. "How Do Energy Use and Climate Change Affect Fast-Start Finance? A Cross-Country Empirical Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    19. Rachel Nadelman & Rosie McGee & Ayesha Khan & Euclides Gonçalves & Jonathan Fox & Richard Burge & Fatai A. Aremu & Colin Anderson, 2023. "International aid actions for accountability: Identifying interaction effects between programmes," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(S1), March.
    20. Michael G. Findley & Helen V. Milner & Daniel L. Nielson, 2017. "The choice among aid donors: The effects of multilateral vs. bilateral aid on recipient behavioral support," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 307-334, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:oefsep:412022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ofsewat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.