IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v41y2023is1ne12680.html

International aid actions for accountability: Identifying interaction effects between programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Nadelman
  • Rosie McGee
  • Ayesha Khan
  • Euclides Gonçalves
  • Jonathan Fox
  • Richard Burge
  • Fatai A. Aremu
  • Colin Anderson

Abstract

Motivation Aid agencies that support public accountability reforms commonly do so in the same places and with similar state and civil society actors. However, the combined effects of their separate programmatic actions are rarely analysed. Purpose This study departs from conventional analysis of aid agency relationships that focuses on the macro level of donor co‐ordination and harmonization. Instead, we look at the interactions that happen in practice between aid agency programmes on the ground. Through doing so we propose a new conceptual lens for understanding these interactions. Methods and approach We explore how programmes with overlapping public accountability goals interact in specific locations and with what effects, based on qualitative fieldwork on four recent programmes that overlapped in sub‐national areas of Pakistan and Nigeria and supported by lighter‐touch research on two programmes in Mozambique. Findings We identify three distinct categories of “interaction effects”—synergy, parallel play, and disconnect. These effects came about both with and without direct engagement between the aid agencies themselves. Synergistic interaction effects—aid agency actions reinforcing one another in pursuit of greater public accountability—were common. Parallel play—siloed working—was also common, risking missed opportunities to extend impact. The study identified one outright disconnect—where aid agency actions undermined each other. Policy implications Using this “interaction effects” lens in practice could inform and strengthen aid agency strategies—avoiding conflicting actions and siloed working—and achieving more through synergy with others, particularly in complex contexts. This applies both in programme design and in adapting to other aid programmes' actions in real time. Development programme research and evaluations would benefit from broadening their lens beyond single‐programme studies to understand the combined effects of multiple actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Nadelman & Rosie McGee & Ayesha Khan & Euclides Gonçalves & Jonathan Fox & Richard Burge & Fatai A. Aremu & Colin Anderson, 2023. "International aid actions for accountability: Identifying interaction effects between programmes," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(S1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:s1:n:e12680
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12680
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bourguignon, François & Platteau, Jean-Philippe, 2015. "The Hard Challenge of Aid Coordination," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 86-97.
    2. Torsvik, Gaute, 2005. "Foreign economic aid; should donors cooperate?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 503-515, August.
    3. Gehring, Kai & Michaelowa, Katharina & Dreher, Axel & Spörri, Franziska, 2017. "Aid Fragmentation and Effectiveness: What Do We Really Know?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 320-334.
    4. Antonio Sianes, 2017. "Shedding Light On Policy Coherence for Development: A Conceptual Framework," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 134-146, January.
    5. Gareth Williams & Olly Owen & Alex Duncan & William Kingsmill & Anna Paterson, 2019. "DFID governance programming in Nigeria: What difference has thinking and working politically made in practice?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(S1), pages 33-49, June.
    6. Niheer Dasandi & Ed Laws & Heather Marquette & Mark Robinson, 2019. "What Does the Evidence Tell Us about ‘Thinking and Working Politically’ in Development Assistance?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 155-168.
    7. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01155283 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Neil McCulloch & Laure‐Hélène Piron, 2019. "Thinking and Working Politically: Learning from practice. Overview to Special Issue," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(S1), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandra Tangianu & Daniel E. Esser & Heiner Janus, 2025. "Why do bureaucrats want mandatory training? A conjoint mixed‐methods analysis of individual learning preferences in German, Norwegian, and South Korean donor agencies," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 43(2), March.
    2. John Gaventa & Anuradha Joshi & Colin Anderson, 2023. "Citizen action for accountability in challenging contexts: What have we learned?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(S1), March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roll, Michael, 2021. "Institutional change through development assistance: The comparative advantages of political and adaptive approaches," IDOS Discussion Papers 28/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Rose Pinnington, 2024. "To go with or against the grain? Politics as practice in the Budget Strengthening Initiative, Uganda," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S4), pages 71-83, July.
    3. Whaley, Luke & Cleaver, Frances & Mwathunga, Evance, 2021. "Flesh and bones: Working with the grain to improve community management of water," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Bourguignon, François & Platteau, Jean-Philippe, 2025. "Aid allocation with optimal monitoring: Theory and policy," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    5. Andrew W. Horowitz & Raja Kali & Hongwei Song, 2021. "Rethinking the aid–growth relationship: A network approach," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 359-380, February.
    6. Kaplan, Lennart, 2020. "Systemic challenges and opportunities of Franco-German development cooperation," IDOS Discussion Papers 10/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    7. Burns, Anthony Francis & Rajabifard, Abbas & Shojaei, Davood, 2023. "Undertaking land administration reform: Is there a better way?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Nathalie Ferrière, 2016. "To give or not to give? How do donors react to European food aid allocation?," Working Papers halshs-01405130, HAL.
    9. Pritish Behuria, 2025. "Donors and Disciplines Meet the Political Economy of Development: The Contested Evolution of Political Settlements Analysis," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 25(2), pages 79-102, April.
    10. Gehring, Kai & Michaelowa, Katharina & Dreher, Axel & Spörri, Franziska, 2017. "Aid Fragmentation and Effectiveness: What Do We Really Know?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 320-334.
    11. Rogelj Janez & Bojnec Štefan & Logožar Klavdij, 2023. "A Model of International Development Cooperation: The Case of Slovenia," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Paradigm, vol. 69(1), pages 1-9, March.
    12. Bernhard Reinsberg & Martin C. Steinwand, 2025. "Lead or Follow? Participation Decisions in Collective Development Initiatives," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 811-825, July.
    13. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    14. Terence Wood & Imogen Nicholls, 2021. "Aid fragmentation and volatility in the Pacific," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 114-128, January.
    15. Philip Keefer & Christopher Kilby, 2021. "Introduction to the special issue: In memoriam Stephen Knack," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 473-493, July.
    16. Matthew S. Winters, 2019. "Too Many Cooks in the Kitchen? The Division of Financing in World Bank Projects and Project Performance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 117-126.
    17. Molenaers, Nadia & Dellepiane, Sebastian & Faust, Jorg, 2015. "Political Conditionality and Foreign Aid," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 2-12.
    18. Peter Nunnenkamp & Rainer Thiele, 2013. "Financing for Development: The Gap between Words and Deeds since Monterrey," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31(1), pages 75-98, January.
    19. Emmanuelle Auriol & Josepa Miquel-Florensa, 2019. "Taxing fragmented aid to improve aid efficiency," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 453-477, September.
    20. Aidan Craney, 2020. "Local Participation or Elite Capture in Sheep’s Clothing? A Conundrum of Locally Led Development," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 191-200.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:s1:n:e12680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.