IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mlucee/327131.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der CPR (Corporate Political Responsibility) für das gesellschaftliche Zusammenleben

Author

Listed:
  • Hübscher, Marc C.
  • Pies, Ingo

Abstract

Mit diesem Artikel wollen wir zum Nachdenken anregen und zur Diskussion einladen. Wir untersuchen Nutzen und Risiken von Corporate Political Responsibility (CPR) in Zeiten multipler Demokratie- und Öffentlichkeitskrisen. Ausgangspunkt ist die Diagnose eines Strukturwandels der Öffentlichkeit mit wachsender Polarisierung. Daraus ergibt sich die Frage nach der Rolle von Unternehmen als politischen Akteuren. In zehn Thesen beleuchten wir Chancen wie Legitimitätssicherung und Stabilisierung demokratischer Rahmenbedingungen, aber auch Risiken wie Ambivalenzen zwischen Demokratie und Kapitalismus oder den Verdacht illegitimer Machtaneignung. Unsere Empfehlungen be- tonen Transparenz, Zurückhaltung gegenüber Parteipolitik und konstruktive Beiträge zur Bewältigung gesellschaftlicher Ordnungsprobleme. CPR erscheint damit notwendig, paradox und diskussionswürdig.

Suggested Citation

  • Hübscher, Marc C. & Pies, Ingo, 2025. "Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der CPR (Corporate Political Responsibility) für das gesellschaftliche Zusammenleben," Discussion Papers 2025-13, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:327131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/327131/1/1937120171.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guenther, Laurenz, 2025. "Political Representation Gaps and Populism," VfS Annual Conference 2025 (Cologne): Revival of Industrial Policy 325441, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Vogel, Jefim & Guerin, Gauthier & O'Neill, Daniel W. & Steinberger, Julia K., 2024. "Safeguarding livelihoods against reductions in economic output," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Pies, Ingo, 2025. "Die Moralisierung politischer Diskurse ist Gift für die Demokratie," Discussion Papers 2025-04, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riepl, Tobias & Schaffartzik, Anke & Grabow, Simon & Banabak, Selim, 2025. "Living well with the foundational economy: Assessing the spatial accessibility of foundational infrastructures in Vienna and the relationship to socio-economic status," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Hayden, Anders, 2025. "Buzzword or breakthrough beyond growth? The mainstreaming of the Wellbeing Economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    3. Richard Bärnthaler & Andreas Novy & Lea Arzberger & Astrid Krisch & Hans Volmary, 2024. "The power to transform structures: power complexes and the challenges for realising a wellbeing economy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Lúcio Costa Proença & Juliana Neira & Vitória Aparecida Cardoso & Joshua Farley, 2025. "Post-Growth for the Global South: Reframing Agricultural Policies in Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Anders Hayden, 2024. "The wellbeing economy in practice: sustainable and inclusive growth? Or a post-growth breakthrough?," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mlucee:327131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwhalde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.