IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ismwps/299601.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Supply Chain Risikomanagement: Analyse des Status Quo und neuer Entwicklungstendenzen

Author

Listed:
  • Zimmermann, Nils Alexander
  • Gericke, Jens

Abstract

Supply Chain Management (SCM) and Risk Management (RM) are two current business management approaches that are based on relatively long historical developments. RM has been steadily developing since the middle of the 20th century while SCM, which started in the early 1990s, is a more recent approach in comparison. In terms of economics both approaches have been well-researched both theoretically as well as practically and variety of models have already been developed and published. Using a quantitative literature analysis, it can be shown how the number of scientific publications covering SCM and RM have increased over the years and that both are established management approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Zimmermann, Nils Alexander & Gericke, Jens, 2018. "Supply Chain Risikomanagement: Analyse des Status Quo und neuer Entwicklungstendenzen," ISM Working Papers 11, International School of Management (ISM), Dortmund.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ismwps:299601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/299601/1/ism-wp11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "Supply Chain Risk Management," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Managing Supply Chain Risk, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 3-11, Springer.
    2. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "Risk Models for Supply Chain Management," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Managing Supply Chain Risk, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 195-240, Springer.
    3. Lars B. Sorensen, 2005. "How risk and uncertainty is used in supply chain management: a literature study," International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 387-409.
    4. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "Researchers’ Perspectives on Supply-Chain Risk Research," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Managing Supply Chain Risk, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 281-301, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Honglin & Zhuo, Wenyan & Shao, Lusheng & Talluri, Srinivas, 2021. "Mean-variance analysis of wholesale price contracts with a capital-constrained retailer: Trade credit financing vs. bank credit financing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 525-542.
    2. Karimi, Majid & Zaerpour, Nima, 2022. "Put your money where your forecast is: Supply chain collaborative forecasting with cost-function-based prediction markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 1035-1049.
    3. Elliot Bendoly & Christopher S. Tang, 2021. "Responsive and Flexible Manufacturing Ecosystems: Stand‐by Capability, Hybrid Manufacturing Approaches, and Reshoring," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1550-1552, May.
    4. Elliot Bendoly & Christopher S. Tang, 2021. "Special Issue: Responsive and Flexible Manufacturing Ecosystems: Stand‐by Capability, Hybrid Manufacturing Approaches, and Reshoring," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 300-302, January.
    5. Silvia Carpitella & Ilyas Mzougui & Joaquín Izquierdo, 2022. "Multi-criteria risk classification to enhance complex supply networks performance," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(3), pages 769-785, September.
    6. Jamshed Raza & Yuxin Liu & Jianwei Zhang & Nan Zhu & Zohaib Hassan & Habib Gul & Sikander Hussain, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Management Practices and Sustainability Performance: The Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    7. Nishat Alam Choudhary & Shalabh Singh & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar, 2023. "Risk assessment in supply chains: a state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 565-607, March.
    8. El Baz, Jamal & Ruel, Salomée, 2021. "Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    9. Setene, Letlama & Jordaan, Daniel du P.S., 2021. "The trade-off between chain performance and fragility considering coordination strategies of agri-food chains: a South African egg chain's case study," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(3), March.
    10. Subodha Kumar & Rakesh R. Mallipeddi, 2022. "Impact of cybersecurity on operations and supply chain management: Emerging trends and future research directions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4488-4500, December.
    11. Peng Liang & Hasan Cavusoglu & Nan Hu, 2023. "Customers’ managerial expectations and suppliers’ asymmetric cost management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1975-1993, June.
    12. Manjot Singh Bhatia, 2021. "Green process innovation and operational performance: The role of proactive environment strategy, technological capabilities, and organizational learning," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2845-2857, November.
    13. Elliot Bendoly & Christopher S. Tang, 2021. "Responsive and Flexible Manufacturing Ecosystems: Stand‐by Capability, Hybrid Manufacturing Approaches, and Reshoring," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 3322-3324, September.
    14. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Cao, Yunzhi, 2021. "The optimal recovery-fund based strategy for uncertain supply chain disruptions: A risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Elliot Bendoly & Christopher S. Tang, 2021. "Responsive and Flexible Manufacturing Ecosystems: Stand‐by Capability, Hybrid Manufacturing Approaches, and Reshoring," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1949-1951, June.
    16. Yi‐Jen (Ian) Ho & Siyuan Liu & Jingchuan Pu & Dian Zhang, 2022. "Is it all about you or your driving? Designing IoT‐enabled risk assessments," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 4205-4222, November.
    17. ur Rehman, Attique & Shakeel Sadiq Jajja, Muhammad & Farooq, Sami, 2022. "Manufacturing planning and control driven supply chain risk management: A dynamic capability perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    18. Elliot Bendoly & Christopher S. Tang, 2021. "Responsive and Flexible Manufacturing Ecosystems: Stand‐by Capability, Hybrid Manufacturing Approaches, and Reshoring," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2343-2345, July.
    19. Elliot Bendoly & Christopher S. Tang, 2021. "Special Issue: Responsive and Flexible Manufacturing Ecosystems: Stand‐by Capability, Hybrid Manufacturing Approaches, and Reshoring," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 611-613, February.
    20. Ramani, Vinay & Ghosh, Debabrata & Sodhi, ManMohan S., 2022. "Understanding systemic disruption from the Covid-19-induced semiconductor shortage for the auto industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Lieferkette; Risikomanagement;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ismwps:299601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ismdode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.