IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/idospb/309597.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Securing a development-friendly US trade policy: The urgent need for an AGOA revamp

Author

Listed:
  • Britz, Wolfgang
  • Olekseyuk, Zoryana
  • Vogel, Tim

Abstract

In times of heightened uncertainty surrounding US trade policy, it is increasingly vital to secure a development-friendly approach toward African countries. They are among the most vulnerable to climate change, conflicts and pandemics, yet are also gaining geo-economic significance. Given the expiry of the US Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) in 2020 and the upcoming expiry of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) in September 2025, Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries urge policymakers to timely reauthorise and upgrade the non-reciprocal trade programme to improve market access to the US and ensure long-term support for sustainable development across the African continent. While the AGOA Renewal and Improvement Act of 2024 was introduced to Congress with bipartisan support, the election of Donald Trump and his "America First" approach have increased doubts about a swift extension of AGOA. This policy brief examines the potential effects of the expirations of GSP and AGOA using a multi-region Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. By simulating the shift from duty-free to Most Favoured Nation (MFN) treatment, we find the following: All in all, aggregated effects over all countries are rather muted while some specific countries face strong losses. Whereas bilateral exports of AGOA-eligible countries to the US decline by 3.7%, their total exports fall by only 0.1%, with real GDP remaining almost unaffected. Looking more closely, specific SSA countries would face high bilateral losses: The most substantial reduction of exports to the US occurs in Lesotho (-35%), Malawi (-25%) and Kenya (-16%), while welfare decline is the highest in Lesotho and Mauritius. The most affected sectors are sugar, wearing apparel, leather, dairy products, and beverages and tobacco. The limited aggregate effects of a loss in trade preferences are mainly driven by relatively weak ties of SSA to the US and rather low US MFN tariff rates. This highlights the limited effectiveness of the AGOA preference scheme, indicating that its renewal should go hand in hand with a comprehensive modernisation of the programme. While the AGOA Renewal and Improvement Act of 2024 acknowledges this, it still falls short of modernising the programme in some key areas. To ensure long-term benefits for SSA economies, we recommend: - A swift reauthorisation for a longer period, incorporating continuation provisions to reduce future uncertainty. - More transparent and predictable eligibility reviews, with a possibility of partial exclusion for non-compliance, would also help mitigate uncertainty. - Expansion of rules of origin, which is crucial for stimulating intra-continental trade and enhancing value addition within SSA. - Widening the programme's scope by addressing, for example, digital trade, services, non-tariff measures, regulatory cooperation and investment facilitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Britz, Wolfgang & Olekseyuk, Zoryana & Vogel, Tim, 2025. "Securing a development-friendly US trade policy: The urgent need for an AGOA revamp," IDOS Policy Briefs 2/2025, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bonn.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:idospb:309597
    DOI: 10.23661/ipb2.2025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/309597/1/1916036139.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23661/ipb2.2025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angel Aguiar & Maksym Chepeliev & Erwin Corong & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2022. "The Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) Data Base: Version 11," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 7(2), pages 1-37, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuru Guan & Jin Yan & Yuli Shan & Yannan Zhou & Ye Hang & Ruoqi Li & Yu Liu & Binyuan Liu & Qingyun Nie & Benedikt Bruckner & Kuishuang Feng & Klaus Hubacek, 2023. "Burden of the global energy price crisis on households," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 304-316, March.
    2. Timothé Beaufils & Joschka Wanner & Leonie Wenz, 2024. "The Potential of Carbon Border Adjustments to Foster Climate Cooperation," CESifo Working Paper Series 11429, CESifo.
    3. Maros Ivanic & Jayson Beckman & Noe Nava, 2023. "Estimation of the Value-Added/Intermediate Input Substitution Elasticities Consistent with the GTAP Data," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 8(2), pages 134-158, December.
    4. Mahlkow, Hendrik & Wanner, Joschka, 2023. "The carbon footprint of global trade imbalances," W.E.P. - Würzburg Economic Papers 108, University of Würzburg, Department of Economics.
    5. Anderson, Kym & Corong, Erwin & Strutt, Anna & Valenzuela, Ernesto, 2023. "The Relative Importance of Global Agricultural Subsidies and Tariffs, Revisited," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3-4), pages 382-394, October.
    6. Kenichi Kawasaki, 2024. "Supply-side Impact of Trade Liberalization and Disruption," GRIPS Discussion Papers 24-04, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    7. Dinopoulos, Elias & Heins, Gunnar & Unel, Bulent, 2024. "Tariff wars, unemployment, and top incomes," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Rasta-Pide, 2023. "The State Of Commerce In Pakistan: International & Domestic," PIDE Research Report 2023:15, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    9. Hendrik Mahlkow & Joschka Wanner, 2023. "The Carbon Footprint of Global Trade Imbalances," CESifo Working Paper Series 10729, CESifo.
    10. Feng, Kuishuang & Chen, Xiangjie, 2023. "Water and Land Stress in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru under Coupled Climate-Socioeconomic Scenarios," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13093, Inter-American Development Bank.
    11. Christoph Böhringer & Knut Einar Rosendah & Halvor Briseid Storrøsten, "undated". "Measures against carbon leakage. Combining output-based allocation with consumption taxes," Discussion Papers 1013, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    12. Abigail Opokua Asare & Laura Schuerer, 2024. "Incidence of Carbon Pricing in Tanzania: Using Revenues to Empower Low-Income Households with Renewable Energy," Working Papers V-446-24, University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, revised Jul 2024.
    13. Yang, Yu & Zhou, Yannan & Shan, Yuli & Hubacek, Klaus, 2024. "The shift of embodied energy flows among the Global South and Global North in the post-globalisation era," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    14. Jing Meng & Jingwen Huo & Zengkai Zhang & Yu Liu & Zhifu Mi & Dabo Guan & Kuishuang Feng, 2023. "The narrowing gap in developed and developing country emission intensities reduces global trade’s carbon leakage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Kenichi Kawasaki, 2023. "Review of Economic Impact of CPTPP," GRIPS Discussion Papers 23-10, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    16. Shiro TAKEDA & Keisaku HIGASHIDA & Morihiro YOMOGIDA, 2024. "Evaluation of the Impacts of Trade Restrictions between China and Japan," Discussion papers 24072, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    17. Countryman, Amanda M. & Litvinov, Valentyn & Kolodiazhnyi, Ivan & Bogonos, Mariia & Nivievskyi, Oleg, 2024. "Agricultural and Economywide Effects of the War in Ukraine," Commissioned Papers 344185, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    18. Mahlkow, Hendrik & Wanner, Joschka, 2023. "The carbon footprint of global trade imbalances," Kiel Working Papers 2260, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    19. Baldos, Uris Lantz C., 2024. "Food inequality and climate change: compounding impacts on caloric undernutrition," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343904, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Wang, Zhan & Hertel, Thomas W., 2024. "Soybean Trade between the United States, Brazil and China: Interactions between Global Trade Flow and Gridded Agricultural and Environmental impacts," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343755, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    global governance; transnational governance; Africa; trade and investment;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:idospb:309597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.