IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/341045.html

Beyond Traditional Paradigms: A Bibliometric and Systematic Content Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Methodological Innovations in Organisational Psychology

Author

Listed:
  • Mdhlalose, Dickson

Abstract

Organisational psychology now has a serious problem with how it conducts research. The standard tools questionnaires at a single point in time, typical regression analysis, and looking at a few organisations as examples do not really fit the way organisations are now: they are always changing, have many levels, and rely heavily on digital technology. So, this research used a large-scale quantitative analysis of published papers (14,617 in total) from Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO, along with a careful, systematic review of their content, to examine how research methods in organisational psychology are changing. It didn't involve asking people directly; instead, the researchers measured how often methods are being used by looking at what's being published, how often those publications are quoted by others, and which keywords are used together. They did this using VOSviewer 1.6.20 and the bibliometrix 4.2.1 package in R. The findings show a 79.8% increase in publications using more sophisticated math-based methods, a 229% increase in studies using digital ethnography (a kind of internet-based observation of groups), and a 296% increase in the use of natural language processing to make sense of information from organisations. Importantly, research that combined different methods (both numbers and words) got considerably more citations (an average of 47.3 per paper) than research which was purely about numbers (31.6) or purely about words (19.4). The paper contends that simply adopting a new method without carefully considering its assumptions about how things work, any ethical concerns, and the specifics of the organisation being studied means we're following methodological trends rather than making scientific progress. To help researchers, they introduce a new Methodological Fit Matrix to help them choose a method that works with their research question, their fundamental beliefs about reality and what can be known, and what's important to people involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Mdhlalose, Dickson, 2026. "Beyond Traditional Paradigms: A Bibliometric and Systematic Content Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Methodological Innovations in Organisational Psychology," EconStor Preprints 341045, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/341045/1/Article1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • C80 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - General
    • C90 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - General
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:341045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.