IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/yor/hectdg/13-16.html

Point identification in the presence of measurement error in discrete variables: application - wages and disability

Author

Listed:
  • Saloniki, E-C.
  • Gosling, A.

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of point identification in the presence of measurement error in discrete variables; in particular, it considers the case of having two “noisy†indicators of the same latent variable and without any prior information about the true value of the variable of interest. Based on the concept of the fourfold table and creating a nonlinear system of simultaneous equations from the observed proportions and predicted wages, we examine the need for different assumptions in order to obtain unique solutions for the system. We show that by imposing a simple restriction(s) for the joint misclassification probabilities, it is possible to measure the extent of the misclassification error in that specific variable. The proposed methodology is then used to identify whether people misreport their disability status using data from the British Household Panel Survey. Our results show that the probability of underreporting is greater than the probability of overreporting disability.

Suggested Citation

  • Saloniki, E-C. & Gosling, A., 2013. "Point identification in the presence of measurement error in discrete variables: application - wages and disability," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 13/16, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
  • Handle: RePEc:yor:hectdg:13/16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/economics/documents/herc/wp/13_16.pdf
    File Function: Main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C35 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions
    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:yor:hectdg:13/16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jane Rawlings (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deyoruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.