IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/sprcdp/0081.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Do the Elderly Fare Cross-Nationally? Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study Project

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Saunders
  • Timothy M. Smeeding

Abstract

This paper uses microdata from the Luxembourg Income Study How Do the Elderly in Taiwan Fare Cross-Nationally? Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study Project Peter Saunders and Timothy M. Smeeding Social Policy Research Centre, Discussion Paper, No.81 Abstract This paper uses microdata from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) to estimate and compare four dimensions of the well-being of the aged in Taiwan and eight other countries - the United States, Japan, Australia, Poland, Finland, Germany, Hungary and Canada. Together, these nine countries cover a broad variety of economic experience, institutional development and cultural tradition which complicate the task of comparing them. The four dimensions studied are (relative) poverty, income distribution, relative economic status and income composition. A key focus of the analysis and a significant feature of the results is the important role which living arrangements (and, to a lesser extent, age and gender) play in determining the relative economic status of the aged in each country. This issue is explored more thoroughly in Taiwan, where the (admittedly exploratory and preliminary) analysis illustrates how shared living arrangements (and hence shared housing costs) represent an important part of the overall safety net for the elderly.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Saunders & Timothy M. Smeeding, 1998. "How Do the Elderly Fare Cross-Nationally? Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study Project," Discussion Papers 0081, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    • Handle: RePEc:wop:sprcdp:0081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sprc.unsw.edu.au/dp/dp081.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheila Shaver, 1992. "Body Rights, Social Rights and the Liberal Welfare State," Discussion Papers 0038, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siu-Yau Lee & Kee-Lee Chou, 2016. "Trends in Elderly Poverty in Hong Kong: A Decomposition Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 551-564, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Saunders, 1997. "Developing Policy Planning and Research Capabilities in the Asia Pacific," Discussion Papers 0078, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    2. Bruce Bradbury, 1996. "Are the Low Income Self-employed Poor?," Discussion Papers 0073, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    3. Peter Saunders, 1995. "Improving Work Incentives in a Means-Tested Welfare System: The 1994 Australian Social Security Reforms," Discussion Papers 0056, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    4. Peter Saunders, 1997. "Poverty, Choice and Legitimacy," Discussion Papers 0076, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    5. Peter Saunders, 1993. "Economic Adjustment and Distributional Change: Income Inequality and Poverty in Australia in the Eighties," Discussion Papers 0047, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    6. Marilyn McHugh & Jane Millar, 1996. "Sole Mothers in Australia: Supporting Mothers to Seek Work," Discussion Papers 0071, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    7. Tony Eardley & George Matheson, 1999. "Australian Attitudes to Unemployment and Unemployed People," Discussion Papers 00102, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    8. Marilyn McHugh, 1999. "The Costs of Children: Budget Standards Estimates and the Child Support Scheme," Discussion Papers 00103, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    9. Peter Whiteford, 1995. "The use of replacement rates in international comparisons of benefit systems," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 3-30, April.
    10. Michael Fine, 1999. "The Responsibility for Child and Aged Care: Shaping Policies for the Future," Discussion Papers 00105, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    11. Melanie Henwood, 1999. "Home and Away: Reflections on Long-term Care in the UK and Australia," Discussion Papers 00101, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    12. Peter Saunders, 1998. "Defining Poverty and Identifying the Poor: Reflections on the Australian Experience," Discussion Papers 0084, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    13. Bjorn Hallerod, 1994. "A New Approach to the Direct Measurement of Consensual Poverty," Discussion Papers 0050, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    14. Sheila Shaver, 1998. "Extension Admidst Retrenchment: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring in Australia and Sweden," Discussion Papers 0092, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    15. Sheila Shaver, 1996. "Liberalism, Gender and Social Policy," Discussion Papers 0068, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    16. Michael Bittman & Judy Wajcman, 1999. "The Rush Hour: The Quality of Leisure Time and Gender Equity," Discussion Papers 0097, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    17. Gerry Redmond, 1999. "Tax-benefit Policies and Parents' Incentives to Work: The Case of Australia 1980-1997," Discussion Papers 00104, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    18. Maureen Baker, 1997. "The Restructuring of the Canadian Welfare State: Ideology and Policy," Discussion Papers 0077, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    19. Sheila Shaver & Peter Saunders, 1995. "Two Papers on Citizenship and Basic Income," Discussion Papers 0055, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    20. Peter Saunders, 1998. "Global Pressures, National Responses: The Australian Welfare State in Context," Discussion Papers 0090, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:sprcdp:0081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spnswau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.