IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Home and Away: Reflections on Long-term Care in the UK and Australia

Listed author(s):
  • Melanie Henwood
Registered author(s):

    The challenges posed by an ageing population are major preoccupations of governments throughout the developed world. There are many dimensions to such challenges, and this paper focuses on issues relating to long-term care in old age. The debate around such matters has been similar in the UK and in Australia. In both countries, a history of incrementalism and poorly presented policy reform has contributed to widespread public mistrust, and a sense of injustice at the extension of means-testing or user pays principles. This paper examines the analysis and conclusions of a Royal Commission in the UK, set up to explore options for the finance and structure of long-term care. A fundamental principle advanced by the Commission is that the risk of needing long-term care should be shared by all citizens, rather than borne by those who have the misfortune to need such care. A separation of the personal care costs of long-term care from the living and housing costs components has been proposed as the most equitable way of sharing costs between individuals and the state. Major reforms to the structure community care in the early 1990s in the UK (and similar developments in Australia) were concerned largely with improving management and accountability of local services and with promoting community rather than residential-based models of care. These failed to address the larger underlying question about the balance of responsibilities between individuals and the state and how to achieve a sustainable model for funding long-term care. The proposals by the Royal Commission in the UK can be seen to offer one such model. It is not without flaws and a cautious initial political response is evident. Nonetheless, the model has an immediate appeal in the simplicity of its argument, and in the prospect of offering improved individual security and enhanced social cohesion.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre in its series Discussion Papers with number 00101.

    in new window

    Length: 32 pages
    Date of creation: Jun 1999
    Handle: RePEc:wop:sprcdp:00101
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Sydney 2052

    Phone: +61 2 9385 3833
    Fax: +61 2 9385 1049
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:sprcdp:00101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.