IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Official Poverty Rates Provide Useful Information about Trends in Children's Economic Welfare?


  • Christopher Jencks
  • Susan E. Mayer


Comparing business cycle peaks, the official poverty rate for American children rose from 14.0% in 1969 to 19.6% in 1989. This increase has been widely cited in policy debates, both as evidence that the war on poverty was counterproductive and as evidence that it should be intensified. But this trend estimate is upwardly biased for at least three major reasons: 1) children's households include more nonrelatives, whose income is not counted when the Census Bureau decides whether a child is poor; 2) official price indices overstate inflation; and 3) Medicaid, food stamps, and rent subsidies have raised many children's material standard of living without raising their household income. In addition, low-income households probably have somewhat more unreported income today than in the past. When we correct the first three problems, child poverty appears to fall sharply during the 1970s and remain roughly constant during the 1980s. Measures of "consumption poverty" among children also increase less than measures of "income poverty" over the same interval. Direct measures of children's living standards mostly support this "revisionist" account. Low-income children saw doctors more often, lived in less-crowded housing, and were more likely to have telephones in 1980 than in 1970. These indicators did not change much between 1980 and 1990. Low-income children's homes were also more likely to have complete plumbing, electrical outlets in every room, a modern sewage system, and air conditioning in 1990 than in the early 1970s. Home ownership declined among low-income parents during both the 1970s and 1980s, but automobile ownership increased slightly. Food consumption probably increased slightly, but the evidence for this is very weak. .

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Jencks & Susan E. Mayer, "undated". "Do Official Poverty Rates Provide Useful Information about Trends in Children's Economic Welfare?," IPR working papers 96-1, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:96-1

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Susan E Mayer, 2000. "Why Welfare Caseloads Fluctuate: A Review of Research on AFDC, SSI, and the Food Stamps Program," Treasury Working Paper Series 00/07, New Zealand Treasury.
    2. Robert Haveman & Andrew Bershadker, 1998. "'Inability to Be Self-reliant' as an Indicator of U.S. Poverty: Measurement, Comparisons, and Implications," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_247, Levy Economics Institute.
    3. Richard Bavier, 2008. "Reconciliation of income and consumption data in poverty measurement," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 40-62.
    4. Burkhauser, Richard V. & Crews, Amy D. & Daly, Mary C., 1997. "Recounting winners and losers in the 1980s: A critique of income distribution measurement methodology," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 35-40, January.
    5. Robert Haveman & Andrew Bershadker, "undated". "Self-reliance and Poverty, Net Earnings Capacity versus: Income for Measuring Poverty," Economics Public Policy Brief Archive ppb_46, Levy Economics Institute.
    6. R. D. Plotnick & E. Smolensky & E. Evenhouse & S. Reilly, "undated". "The Twentieth Century Record of Inequality and Poverty in the United States," Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Papers 1166-98, University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty.
    7. Jeffrey B. Liebman, 1998. "The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Incentives and Income Distribution," NBER Chapters,in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 12, pages 83-120 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Marcia K. Meyers & Irwin Garfinkel, 1999. "Social indicators and the study of inequality," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, issue Sep, pages 149-163.
    9. R. Haveman & A. Bershadker, "undated". "The “Inability to Be Self-Reliant” as an Indicator of Poverty: Trends in the United States, 1975–1995," Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Papers 1171-98, University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:96-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.