IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Do Official Poverty Rates Provide Useful Information about Trends in Children's Economic Welfare?

Listed author(s):
  • Christopher Jencks
  • Susan E. Mayer

Comparing business cycle peaks, the official poverty rate for American children rose from 14.0% in 1969 to 19.6% in 1989. This increase has been widely cited in policy debates, both as evidence that the war on poverty was counterproductive and as evidence that it should be intensified. But this trend estimate is upwardly biased for at least three major reasons: 1) children's households include more nonrelatives, whose income is not counted when the Census Bureau decides whether a child is poor; 2) official price indices overstate inflation; and 3) Medicaid, food stamps, and rent subsidies have raised many children's material standard of living without raising their household income. In addition, low-income households probably have somewhat more unreported income today than in the past. When we correct the first three problems, child poverty appears to fall sharply during the 1970s and remain roughly constant during the 1980s. Measures of "consumption poverty" among children also increase less than measures of "income poverty" over the same interval. Direct measures of children's living standards mostly support this "revisionist" account. Low-income children saw doctors more often, lived in less-crowded housing, and were more likely to have telephones in 1980 than in 1970. These indicators did not change much between 1980 and 1990. Low-income children's homes were also more likely to have complete plumbing, electrical outlets in every room, a modern sewage system, and air conditioning in 1990 than in the early 1970s. Home ownership declined among low-income parents during both the 1970s and 1980s, but automobile ownership increased slightly. Food consumption probably increased slightly, but the evidence for this is very weak. .

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University in its series IPR working papers with number 96-1.

in new window

Date of creation:
Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:96-1
Contact details of provider: Postal:
2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208-4100

Phone: 847-491-8712
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:96-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.