IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Evolving Regional Governance Structures for future EU Cohesion Policy: Croatian Perspectives

Listed author(s):
  • Marijana Sumpor
  • Irena Dokic


European cohesion policy has been inspiring Croatian national policy makers for a decade in the attempt to organize and prepare the institutional structures for new ways of designing and implementing a modern regional development policy. Emphasis has been put to a large extent on the design of strategic development documents, while implementation remains problematic. As Croatia is becoming an EU member in July 2013, the future EU Cohesion policy becomes also important for national development policy. Through EU pre-accession funded projects, the first regional operational programmes have been drafted in the period 2001-2003. At that time, no NUTS classification of regions existed and focus was on counties, which today have NUTS III level status. Croatia’s regional policy was rather fragmented and oriented towards areas of special concern such as war torn areas, island, hilly and mountainous areas. The process of creating an integrated regional policy framework including a law, by-laws and a national strategy started in 2003 and ended in May 2010. Since then, all counties were obliged to formulate 3 year integrated strategic programmes involving local stakeholders into partnerships. The process is designed according to a legally prescribed methodology that is based on EU programming and partnership principles. On NUTS II level, functioning as statistical regions, three coordination partnerships of county representatives meet and discuss joint project proposals to be submitted to the national level institutions. These in turn try to establish project pipelines on national level to be ready for EU structural funding. The entire process is promising, but is full of complex and intertwined problems on all governance levels, which significantly influences policy implementation. While policymakers and public administrations are thinking more of the efficiency of the system and its institutions, the regional and local stakeholders’ and the research community’s attention is more on effectiveness of the policy. In order to establish regional governance system that works, cooperation and coordinated actions of all sides is required. The main aim of this paper is to present the evolution of the partnership based regional development approach in Croatia across governance levels and to critically reflect on the outcomes of this process. It is about the creation of new governance structures and new ways of how institutions work. Many problems appear along the way, but some positive experiences can be presented and analysed. Results from a recent survey and research study on experiences in regional development planning in all Croatian counties will be presented. Key words: regional development policy, cohesion policy, governance, institutions, strategic planning JEL: R58 (Regional Development Planning and Policy), H83 (Public Administration), P11 (Capitalist Planning, Coordination and Reform)

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersa12p770.

in new window

Date of creation: Oct 2012
Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p770
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria

Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa12p770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.