IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vuw/vuwcpf/20254.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reforms to New Zealand Superannuation Eligibility: Are They a Good Idea?

Author

Listed:
  • Gemmell, Norman

Abstract

This paper examines the recently announced (March 2017) reforms to New Zealand Superannuation (NZS), raising the age of eligibility to 67 from 2037 and changing eligibility rules. With an ageing population, pensions that are indexed to wages and funded out of current tax revenues, there is much debate over the merits of existing and alternative NZS policy settings. But is this proposed reform the right call? The paper focuses particularly on the intergenerational consequences of current and reformed NZS settings, addressing two questions: (i) how are the reforms likely to impact on intergenerational equity?; and (ii) even if correct in principle, does the proposed implementation from 2037 represent unreasonable delay?

Suggested Citation

  • Gemmell, Norman, 2017. "Reforms to New Zealand Superannuation Eligibility: Are They a Good Idea?," Working Paper Series 20254, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    • Handle: RePEc:vuw:vuwcpf:20254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/20254
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:manchs:v:68:y:2000:i:5:p:539-51 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. John Creedy & Justin Van De Ven, 2000. "Retirement Incomes: Private Savings versus Social Transfers," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 68(5), pages 539-551, September.
    3. John Creedy, 1994. "Financing higher education: public choice and social welfare," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 15(3), pages 87-108, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gemmell, Norman, 2017. "Reforms to New Zealand Superannuation Eligibility: Are They a Good Idea?," Working Paper Series 6556, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    2. John Creedy & Shuyun May Li & Solmaz Moslehi, 2008. "The Composition of Government Expenditure in an Overlapping Generations Model," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1043, The University of Melbourne.
    3. John Freebairn, 2007. "Some Policy Issues in Providing Retirement Incomes," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2007n06, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    4. Ramanjini & Karnam Gayithri, 2019. "Who benefits from higher education expenditure? Evidence from recent household survey of India," Working Papers 454, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
    5. Antonis Adam & Thomas Moutos, 2009. "Pension Funding In A Unionized Economy," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 56(2), pages 213-231, May.
    6. Angus Armstrong & Justin Van de Ven, 2016. "The Impact of Possible Migration Scenarios after ‘Brexit’ on the State Pension System," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-13, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vuw:vuwcpf:20254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library Technology Services (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcvuwnz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.