IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uta/papers/2011_08.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Aristotelian View of MarxÂ’s Method

Author

Listed:
  • Nathaniel Cline
  • William McColloch
  • Kirsten Ford

Abstract

A number of Marxist scholars have tied aspects of MarxÂ’s thought to certain Aristotelian categories, yet remarkably little is said of MarxÂ’s dialectical materialism in this literature. Here we attempt to lay a foundation for such an effort, paying particular attention to the way in which AristotleÂ’s mediated starting point resonates in MarxÂ’s method. While Hegel is able to grasp manÂ’s self-creation as a process, his dialectical method proceeds from an unmediated starting point, and impresses Idealism upon the Aristotelian categories. In rejecting the Idealist dimensions of HegelÂ’s dialectic, Marx implicitly reclaims the materialist dimensions of AristotleÂ’s system. It will be argued here that such an interpretation sheds important light on the nature of MarxÂ’s departure from Hegel, and on his method in Capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathaniel Cline & William McColloch & Kirsten Ford, 2011. "An Aristotelian View of MarxÂ’s Method," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2011_08, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:uta:papers:2011_08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economics.utah.edu/research/publications/2011_08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balakrishnan, Ramji & Penno, Mark, 2014. "Causality in the context of analytical models and numerical experiments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 531-534.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uta:papers:2011_08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuutus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.