IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/usi/wpaper/933.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The more, the merrier': John R. McCulloch and the 'Corn Model

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Di Bucchianico

  • Alessandro Le Donne

Abstract

This paper offers new textual evidence supporting the Sraffian 'corn-ratio' interpretation of David Ricardo's early theory of profits. We analyze the first edition (1825) of John Ramsay McCulloch's Principles of Political Economy, arguing that it provides a clear articulation of the profit rate’s physical determination. McCulloch, Ricardo’s pupil, defines profit as the excess of commodities produced over those expended in production and calculates the profit rate directly in physical quantities of corn. This finding parallels the evidence found in Torrens, ultimately reinforcing the argument that the ‘corn model’ was deeply rooted in the early classical tradition. At last, our comparative analysis contrasts this initial, clear physical framework with McCulloch’s later shift towards value-centric reasoning.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Di Bucchianico & Alessandro Le Donne, 2025. "The more, the merrier': John R. McCulloch and the 'Corn Model," Department of Economics University of Siena 933, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
  • Handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.deps.unisi.it/quaderni/933.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A31 - General Economics and Teaching - - Multisubject Collective Works - - - Multisubject Collected Writings of Individuals
    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • B30 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabrizio Becatti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desieit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.