IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ums/papers/2011-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Empirical Analysis of Risk Preferences, Compensation Risk, and Employee Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Fidan Ana Kurtulus

    () (University of Massachusetts Amherst)

  • Douglas Kruse

    (Rutgers University)

  • Joseph Blasi

    (Rutgers University)

Abstract

We use the NBER Shared Capitalism Database comprised of more than 40,000 employee surveys from 14 firms to explore whether a close match between workers’ risk preferences and the riskiness of their compensation packages relates to improved employee outcomes including lower absenteeism, lower shirking, lower probability of voluntary turnover, greater worker motivation, and higher levels of job satisfaction and loyalty. To do this, we use survey questions reflecting workers’ risk aversion parameters, coupled with a series of measures of the riskiness of workers’ compensation packages including the proportion of pay comprised of various forms of shared capitalism such as profit and gain sharing, ownership of company stock, and bonus arrangements. The primary finding of our paper is that a match between the workers’ risk preferences and the extent of risk in their compensation increases workers’ motivation, job satisfaction, company attachment, and loyalty, but risk-averse workers are generally less responsive to a preference-compensation match than risk-loving workers. JEL Categories:

Suggested Citation

  • Fidan Ana Kurtulus & Douglas Kruse & Joseph Blasi, 2011. "An Empirical Analysis of Risk Preferences, Compensation Risk, and Employee Outcomes," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2011-10, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ums:papers:2011-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.umass.edu/economics/publications/2011-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ums:papers:2011-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Daniele Girardi). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/deumaus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.