IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/udf/wpaper/20260215.html

Institutional Work in Hybrid Organizations' accounting change

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Bellinello

Abstract

Municipal Owned Corporations (MOCs) are a very common type of form in the panorama of hybrid organizations, combining public ownership with the operational logic of private law. To this end, these types of organizations represent a fertile ground for studying how accounting is aimed at mediating institutional complexity. Referring to the framework dictated by institutional work theory, the case study in question is aimed at examining how organizational actors intentionally create, maintain and interrupt accounting practices. In question, the case study adopts the accounting tool as a neutral technical instrument but as the object and result of the institutional work of those who design, negotiate and use it. The case study is based on a longitudinal case of an Italian MOC called Gamma, with data collected over three years through 16 meetings and 10 qualitative interviews developed with CEO, CFO and managers and line managers. The esults are aimed at demonstrating how the strategic plan builds organizational identity and reconciles managerial and public logics, with incorporation and reflexivity as key factors in the universe of hybrid organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Bellinello, 2026. "Institutional Work in Hybrid Organizations' accounting change," Working Papers 20260215, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:udf:wpaper:20260215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://out.economia.unife.it/uploads/dip_deit/quaderni/20260215.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udf:wpaper:20260215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alberto Benati (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deferit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.