IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucn/wpaper/202303.html

Hospital Efficiency and Consultants’ Private Practices: Analysing the Impact of a Voluntary Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Xidong Guo

Abstract

This paper explores the effectiveness of the voluntary reform. It studies a voluntary healthcare reform that was implemented in Ireland in 2008. The analysis is conducted using a theoretical model and empirical evidence. In 2008, in the hope to reduce waiting lists, new contracts were issued which limited the proportion of private patients that consultants could treat while and compensating them with a higher fixed salary. This new contract was optional for consultants hired before 2008. It was compulsory for newly hired consultants. The theoretical model establishes that this reform reduced the overall number of treated patients because the restriction on private practices disincentivises consultants to attend to more patients. A difference-in-differences approach is then employed where inpatients entering through the Emergency Department are considered as the control group. I use micro-level data to access the impact on the Length of Stay (LOS) and control patients’ characteristics and medication conditions. Using Little’ Law, I establish that the LOS is negatively correlated with the number of admissions. The empirical results also show a 0.28-day increase in the LOS for public patients, which suggests that the 2008 voluntary contract reform led to unexpected adverse impacts and may fail to address the waiting list issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Xidong Guo, 2023. "Hospital Efficiency and Consultants’ Private Practices: Analysing the Impact of a Voluntary Reform," Working Papers 202303, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucn:wpaper:202303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/24353
    File Function: First version, 2023
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • H44 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets
    • J41 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Labor Contracts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucn:wpaper:202303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: UCD School of Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/educdie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.