IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tul/wpaper/2605.html

Conducting Fiscal Incidence Analysis For Sustainability: The Case Of Government Urban Infrastructure Spending

Author

Listed:
  • James Alm

    (Tulane University)

  • Farah Khan

    (Brookings Institution)

Abstract

Who benefits from government fiscal policies? Providing an answer to this question is a crucial element in maintaining the sustainability of government policies. In this paper we extend traditional tax incidence studies to benefit incidence studies, focusing especially on the incidence of government provided public goods in the form of urban transportation infrastructure spending. Valuing and allocating the benefits of government expenditures on public goods are challenging tasks because it is hard to measure (and value) the output of these programs and also because it is hard to allocate the benefits of these programs to individual recipients. One common approach is to determine which households have more or less access to government expenditure programs. However, this “access indicators approach” does not typically allow the valuation of these programs for individuals. We develop an alternative approach that allows us both to measure individual access to government infrastructure programs and to estimate the time savings to individual households from these infrastructure programs. This “time-savings approach” therefore has the potential to enable us to estimate the value of these infrastructure programs for individual households and to allocate these time savings to the households. To illustrate both approaches, we provide detailed examples of their application, using data from Indonesia and Mozambique. We find that both approaches provide useful information on the differential benefits across households of transportation infrastructure programs. Importantly, we also find that the time-savings approach has the potential to provide estimates at the household level of the monetary value of government urban infrastructure improvements via the value of reduced travel time, illustrating the power of this approach in allocating and valuing the benefits of public goods like transportation infrastructure spending for individual households. Fully realizing the potential of the time-savings approach requires access to data with accurate time and distance variables at the household level.

Suggested Citation

  • James Alm & Farah Khan, 2026. "Conducting Fiscal Incidence Analysis For Sustainability: The Case Of Government Urban Infrastructure Spending," Working Papers 2605, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:tul:wpaper:2605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.tulane.edu/RePEc/pdf/tul2605.pdf
    File Function: First Version, May 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H22 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Incidence
    • H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • R42 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government and Private Investment Analysis; Road Maintenance; Transportation Planning

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tul:wpaper:2605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nicholas Lacoste (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detulus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.