IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/itepro/8308651.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comparative Study Of Lecturer Quality And Support For Research Output In Selected Public And Private Universities In Southwest, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • OLUMUYIWA VIATONU

    (MICHAEL OTEDOLA COLLEGE OF PRIMARY EDUCATION)

  • MUKAILA OLAGUNJU

    (MICHAEL OTEDOLA COLLEGE OF PRIMARY EDUCATION)

  • CHARLES ILLO

    (MICHAEL OTEDOLA COLLEGE OF PRIMARY EDUCATION)

  • IDRIS SALAMI

    (MICHAEL OTEDOLA COLLEGE OF PRIMARY EDUCATION)

  • ABEDEEN SULUKA

    (MICHAEL OTEDOLA COLLEGE OF PRIMARY EDUCATION)

  • BOLAYEMI ALAKA-OSINOWO

    (MICHAEL OTEDOLA COLLEGE OF PRIMARY EDUCATION)

  • OLAYINKA DAGUNDURO

    (MICHAEL OTEDOLA COLLEGE OF PRIMARY EDUCATION)

Abstract

The study set out to compare the quality of lecturers available in and the support for research and publication in selected public and private universities in southwest Nigeria. The descriptive survey research design was adopted for the study. Stratified random sampling technique was used to select 77 (40 public and 37 private) lecturers from 12 (six public and six private) selected universities in southwest Nigeria. Research and Knowledge Dissemination Questionnaire for Academic Staff in Nigerian Universities (RKDQ-ASNU) with a reliability coefficient of 0.75, which had been used in a previous study, was used for data collection. The data collected were analyzed using frequency counts and simple percentages while t-test was used to test the hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The results showed that the quality of lecturers (as measured by cadre/status/grade and qualification) employed by public universities was higher and better than those employed in private universities. On a general note, lecturers in public universities enjoyed more support for research and publication than their counterparts in private universities but lecturers in private universities were found to be better than their counterparts in public universities in terms of access to financial support for compulsory annual research leave and organization of seminars and conferences for staff by the institutions. Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended that private universities should recruit high caliber staff with requisite academic qualifications and provide an enabling environment for their lecturers to develop on the job through improved conditions of service and job security. Proprietors of public and private universities should allocate adequate funds to research activities in their institutions by granting more access to research grants and providing more financial support for lecturers to attend conferences, workshops and seminars.

Suggested Citation

  • Olumuyiwa Viatonu & Mukaila Olagunju & Charles Illo & Idris Salami & Abedeen Suluka & Bolayemi Alaka-Osinowo & Olayinka Dagunduro, 2018. "A Comparative Study Of Lecturer Quality And Support For Research Output In Selected Public And Private Universities In Southwest, Nigeria," Proceedings of Teaching and Education Conferences 8308651, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:itepro:8308651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/5th-teaching-education-conference-amsterdm/table-of-content/detail?cid=83&iid=010&rid=8651
    File Function: First version, 2018
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Lecturer quality; research output; publication; public and private universities; southwest Nigeria.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:itepro:8308651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.