IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/itepro/3906567.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Comparative study on informatics curriculum : focused on Korea, United states, and United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Youngjun Lee

    (Korea National University of Education)

  • Seogn-Won Kim

    (Korea National University of Education)

  • Seounghey Paik

    (Korea National University of Education)

Abstract

Since the importance of software in society, software education has been globally introduced. Korean government is also trying to promote talents by the revision of curriculum; however, due to the lack of lesson hour, education course is not enough to foster sufficient software focused talents. Thus, by supplementation of present curriculum, the development of new curriculum model has been needed. In this study, as a basic research of this development of curriculum model, curriculum revised in 2015 of Korea was compared with that of U. S. A. and that of England. Through the comparison, it was possible to find out what is needed to make up for informatics curriculum. This result could be used as an advanced research for the development of software curriculum model with Korean education context.

Suggested Citation

  • Youngjun Lee & Seogn-Won Kim & Seounghey Paik, 2016. "An Comparative study on informatics curriculum : focused on Korea, United states, and United Kingdom," Proceedings of Teaching and Education Conferences 3906567, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:itepro:3906567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/3rd-teaching-education-conference-barcelona/table-of-content/detail?cid=39&iid=015&rid=6567
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    computer science curriculum; comparative study; International Study; secondary school curriculum;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:itepro:3906567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.