IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/1002548.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Maturity Level of Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education Based on Capability Maturity Model Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Paralee Maneerat

    (Chulalongkorn University)

  • Kanchit Malaivongs

    (Chulalongkorn University)

  • Jintavee Khlaisang

    (Chulalongkorn University)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show the similarity between Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (TQF: HEd) and maturity level of Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) at Carnegie Mellon university. TQF is to put all universities to have standard curriculum in each field. At the same time, TQF emphasis necessary skill as well as long terms the improvement curriculum. In 2009, the Office of the Higher Education Commission announced that TQF is required for higher education in Thailand as guidelines for the education system in order to act like a framework for curriculum standard in Thailand. Universities are set to follow TQF 1 to TQF 7: TQF 1 is the standard curriculum for each field as defined by the Higher Education Commission, TQF 2 is used for the curriculum development, TQF 3 is used for the course syllabus, TQF 4 is used for the field experience syllabus, TQF 5 is used for the course report, TQF 6 is the field experience report, and TQF 7 is use for the improvement curriculum.On the other hand, CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration) is the process model improvement. It is divided into three categories: CMMI for Development (CMMI-DEV), CMMI for Acquisition (CMMI-ACQ), and CMMI for Service (CMMI-SVC). CMMI has five maturity levels and 22 process areas. Each process area can be classified into specific goals and generic goals.In summary, TQF has been developed along the concepts of process improvement which is the core principles of CMMI. The comparison of the TQF and the process of CMMI in the development curriculum, teaching and learning, and improve curriculum. It provides more insight to instructors and curriculum development committees to better manage and improve the program report.

Suggested Citation

  • Paralee Maneerat & Kanchit Malaivongs & Jintavee Khlaisang, 2015. "Maturity Level of Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education Based on Capability Maturity Model Integration," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 1002548, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:1002548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/international-academic-conference-rome/table-of-content/detail?cid=10&iid=117&rid=2548
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Thailand Qualification Framework; TQF; Maturity Level; CMMI;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:1002548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.