Uncertainty and Judgment Aggregation in Monetary Policy Committees
Monetary policymakers face considerable uncertainty and have to use judgment. When the monetary policy committee (MPC) has to reach a decision based on different judgments among its members, various judgment aggregation problems may occur. Here, we consider an aggregation problem called the 'discursive dilemma', which is characterized by an inconsistency between the aggregate judgment on the premises for a conclusion and the aggregate judgment on the conclusion itself. If there is a discursive dilemma, the decision will depend on whether the MPC uses a premise-based or a conclusion-based decision procedure. We first show that the discursive dilemma is likely to be relevant for monetary policy decisions. Second, we analyze which decision procedure gives the better results. If there is only additive uncertainty, the two decision procedures are equally good. If there is multiplicative (Brainard) uncertainty, we find that a premise-based procedure gives better monetary policy decisions. Lastly, we discuss implications of our finding for optimal organization of interest rate decisions and for optimal characteristics of MPC members. We find that if the MPC votes directly on the interest rate, and not on the premises, the government should appoint overconfident MPC members, i.e., members who underestimate the true degree of uncertainty
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||04 Jul 2006|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://comp-econ.org/|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.