IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sce/scecf4/194.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Occasionally Binding Collateral Constraints in RBC Models

Author

Listed:
  • Emilio Espino & Thomas Hintermaier

Abstract

On the one hand, recently a number of theoretical models have highlighted the role of credit market frictions in propagating and amplifying macroeconomic shocks. On the other hand, it still seems an open question whether this role is quantitatively significant. Our paper tries to fill this gap. We construct a DSGE model in the tradition of the RBC literature. Within this framework, we impose restrictions on asset trading which follow from the credit constraint structure used by, for example, Kiyotaki and Moore (1997) and Kocherlakota (2000). Except for those collateral constraints we assume that markets are complete, considering a full set of Arrow securities. Our main focus is on the quantitative impact of collateral constraints on equilibrium allocations and prices. Therefore, we study amplification and persistence, some asset pricing implications, and the welfare issues in such a model. The crucial aspect of our approach is that collateral constraints are occasionally binding. This is in contrast to the previous literature that has made assumptions strong enough to ensure that collateral constraints were always (i.e., for all periods) binding for the same subset of agents. The feature of occasionally binding constraints also makes our model challenging from a computational point of view. To this end, we implement a collocation version of projection methods in the spirit of Judd (1992) and Christiano and Fisher (2000)

Suggested Citation

  • Emilio Espino & Thomas Hintermaier, 2004. "Occasionally Binding Collateral Constraints in RBC Models," Computing in Economics and Finance 2004 194, Society for Computational Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf4:194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Szilárd Benk & Max Gillman & Michal Kejak, 2005. "Credit Shocks in the Financial Deregulatory Era: Not the Usual Suspects," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 8(3), pages 668-687, July.
    2. Vasilev, Aleksandar, 2021. "Are credit shocks quantitatively important for the propagation of aggregate fluctuations in Bulgaria (1999-2018)?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(3), pages 5-20.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    occasionally binding constraints; collateral constraints; projection methods; collocation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • C68 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computable General Equilibrium Models
    • E32 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
    • E44 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf4:194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sceeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.