The Demise of Investment-Banking Partnerships: Theory and Evidence
Until 1970, the New York Stock Exchange prohibited public incorporation of member firms. After the rules were relaxed to allow joint stock firm membership, investment-banking concerns organized as partnerships or closely-held private corporations went public in waves, with Goldman Sachs (1999) the last of the bulge bracket banks to float. In this paper we ask why the Investment Banks chose to float after 1970, and why they did so in waves. Our explanation extends previous work which examined the role of partnerships in fostering the formation of human capital (Morrison and Wilhelm, 2003). We examine in this context the effect of technological innovations which serve to replace or to undermine the role of the human capitalist and hence we provide a technological theory of the partnershipâ€™s going-public decision. We support our theory with a new dataset of investment bank partnership statistics.
|Date of creation:||2004|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.finance.ox.ac.ukEmail: |
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sbs:wpsefe:2004fe14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Maxine Collett)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.