IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/11-699.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Satisfaction Matter More if a Multichannel Customer Is also a Multicompany Customer?

Author

Listed:
  • B. LARIVIÈRE

    ()

  • B. COOIL
  • L. AKSOY
  • T. L. KEININGHAM

Abstract

Purpose – Although the influence of using multiple channels on customer behavior has been investigated, most of this research has focused on channel behavior within a single company. Customers however frequently have access to multiple providers amongst which they can choose to allocate their spending in a category. Prior research therefore has neglected to understand what happens when a multichannel customer also chooses to conduct business with multiple companies. This research investigates the moderating influence of both multichannel and multicompany usage on the impact that customer satisfaction has on share of wallet (SOW). Design/methodology/approach - The data used in the analyses was collected as part of both survey and transactional data of 802 households of a large financial services provider. Within class regression models were employed to test the moderating effects of different segments that were identified based on multichannel-multicompany customer differences. Findings – The findings confirm that using multiple channels has an overall positive moderating impact on the satisfaction – SOW link and that customer satisfaction matters more when the customer adopts multiple channels; online channel usage in addition to offline usage. Furthermore, this effect is even more pronounced for customers that transact with multiple providers. That is, the group of customers that use both the company’s and competitors’ offline and online channels reveal a higher satisfaction - SOW association than the group of customers that only adopted the offline channel with the company and competitor. Research limitations/implications – The limitation is that this research examines a single industry. The results however clearly show the need for future research to account for both multichannel and multicompany differences to fully understand the effect of customer satisfaction on share of wallet. Originality/value – There are two major differences of the paper compared to what has already been done in the literature: (1) It examines the impact of both multichannel and multicompany usage, which has never been investigated before; (2) It examines the moderating impact of these variables on the satisfaction - behavior link / relationship as opposed to the direct effect on satisfaction or behavior separately or in isolation. This research also provides important managerial guidance on the need to capture customers’ multicompany preferences and how to more efficiently allocate budgets in creating satisfaction with the goal of ensuring higher share of spending by taking on a more targeted approach.

Suggested Citation

  • B. Larivière & B. Cooil & L. Aksoy & T. L. Keiningham, 2011. "Does Satisfaction Matter More if a Multichannel Customer Is also a Multicompany Customer?," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 11/699, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:11/699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_11_699.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Estela Fernández-Sabiote & Sergio Román, 2016. "The multichannel customer’s service experience: building satisfaction and trust," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 10(2), pages 423-445, June.
    2. repec:spr:irpnmk:v:15:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s12208-017-0188-9 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Multichannel; Multicompany; Customer Satisfaction; Share of Wallet; Financial Services;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:11/699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nathalie Verhaeghe). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.