IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rtv/ceisrp/621.html

Flexibility Versus Security in Agency Contracts with Moral Hazard

Author

Listed:

Abstract

We study agency contracts where a project owner (principal) privately learns her opportunity cost of continuing the relationship after the agent’s effort is sunk. The principalcontrols the design of termination rights and faces a trade-off between preserving incentives and retaining exit flexibility. Even without legal constraints, fully flexible (at-will), fully rigid (lock-in), and intermediate contracts offering partial security and compensation can all arise at equilibrium. While some contractsmay appear to protect the agent, they are always socially inefficient, justifying targeted legal constraints on termination rights. In particular, at-will contracts always under-secure the agent and under-enforce the project and can be banned on efficiency grounds. Inefficiencies also include excessive termination payments and over-securing, suggesting both toomuch and too little flexibility distort outcomes. Finally, we characterize aminimalmandatory termination fee, as commonly seen in employment protection laws, that partially restores efficiency

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Bozzoli & Guillaume Pommey, 2026. "Flexibility Versus Security in Agency Contracts with Moral Hazard," CEIS Research Paper 621, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 16 Jun 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:rtv:ceisrp:621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ceistorvergata.it/RePEc/rpaper/RP621.pdf
    File Function: Main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D86 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Economics of Contract Law
    • J33 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Compensation Packages; Payment Methods
    • J65 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Unemployment Insurance; Severance Pay; Plant Closings

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rtv:ceisrp:621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Barbara Piazzi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrotit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.